2021
DOI: 10.1080/25725084.2021.1880766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international convention for the safety of life at sea: highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation

Abstract: Safety is often described as freedom from unacceptable risk. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) since its establishment has consistently been working towards mitigation of risks at sea by implementing measures through specific legal Instruments. The IMO's principle Instrument with this focus is the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS). By identifying and examining a wide range of risks that must be addressed in order to ensure the safe operations of ships … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article does not argue that some risk mitigations are better than others for users to employ (due to the differing operations conducted) and instead argues that the number of risk mitigations employed is a more important metric because each particular risk mitigation addresses different types of risks. This argument parallels those made in other safety-sensitive operating environments, such as construction, maritime, and research laboratories [31][32][33]. Below, each risk mitigation included in this study is described and its inclusion justified.…”
Section: User-based Operational Risk Mitigationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article does not argue that some risk mitigations are better than others for users to employ (due to the differing operations conducted) and instead argues that the number of risk mitigations employed is a more important metric because each particular risk mitigation addresses different types of risks. This argument parallels those made in other safety-sensitive operating environments, such as construction, maritime, and research laboratories [31][32][33]. Below, each risk mitigation included in this study is described and its inclusion justified.…”
Section: User-based Operational Risk Mitigationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The number of pre-flight risk mitigations (i.e., all except for air band radio) was also recorded as a sum of the number of the "yes" categorisations for the options covered in question 9, with 8 being the maximum score. This is because each risk mitigation addresses slightly different risks, so one can argue that the greater the number typically applied, the higher one's risk mitigation, following similar arguments in other safety-sensitive environments [31][32][33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After being assessed, risks are usually ranked as negligible, tolerable, and intolerable. The risks classified as tolerable are meant to be As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) (Joseph & Dalaklis, 2021;Wang, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Joseph & Dalaklis, (2021), many Solas 1974 rules and related supporting codes of work have complemented each other and together have contributed positively to the safety of personnel, the environment and Solas 1974 convention and has ratified its implementation in 2013, which accommodates several state ships to comply with the applicable rules in the Solas 1974 convention, the implementation of its implementation is also related to commercial ships. Safety training management training is very important for the safety of ships, crew, and passengers (Dragomir & Simona, 2016).…”
Section: Safety Guidementioning
confidence: 99%