2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1521658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Monetary Fund and Regulatory Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Branding an exchange rate "fundamentally misaligned" has proved to be no easier to implement for the Fund than identifying "manipulation," and in June 2009 the IMF management had to reverse course and withdraw not only the proposal to make increased use of ad hoc consultations but also the de facto application of the concept of fundamental misalignment itself (see IMF 2009a). 25 Truman (2010) concluded that the 2007 surveillance decision produced no tangible results affecting members' exchange rate policies; how a June 2009 staff guidance note (IMF, 2009a) could characterize the 2007 decision as "…a landmark for the Fund"-rather than a landmine-is beyond me. Michael Mussa (2008, p. 281 ), a former economic counselor at the Fund, has analyzed in considerable detail the Fund's exchange rate surveillance toward China's exchange rate policies.…”
Section: Reforming the Exchange Rate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branding an exchange rate "fundamentally misaligned" has proved to be no easier to implement for the Fund than identifying "manipulation," and in June 2009 the IMF management had to reverse course and withdraw not only the proposal to make increased use of ad hoc consultations but also the de facto application of the concept of fundamental misalignment itself (see IMF 2009a). 25 Truman (2010) concluded that the 2007 surveillance decision produced no tangible results affecting members' exchange rate policies; how a June 2009 staff guidance note (IMF, 2009a) could characterize the 2007 decision as "…a landmark for the Fund"-rather than a landmine-is beyond me. Michael Mussa (2008, p. 281 ), a former economic counselor at the Fund, has analyzed in considerable detail the Fund's exchange rate surveillance toward China's exchange rate policies.…”
Section: Reforming the Exchange Rate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latest reform of the IMF’s surveillance system, the concept of external stability, namely implications of a country’s current and capital account balances for the global economy, was introduced into IMF surveillance. Critics point out that this emphasis on multilateral repercussions did not alter IMF surveillance from being bilateral between the IMF and a member country (Truman, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… On crucial issues, states have not been forthcoming with critical data. For instance, countries with 40 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves have declined to provide information to the IMF on the currency composition of their holdings (Truman, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%