In note Q16 §2 Antonio Gramsci introduces us to truth seeking as eroico furore (heroic fury), an active striving not simply to attain a particular form of knowledge but to form a conception of the world. Eroico furore, for Gramsci, is about the development of a sensibility and the forming of personality. As Gramsci puts it, 'any new theory studied with "heroic fury" [eroico furore] (that is, studied not out of mere external curiosity but for reasons of deep interest) for a certain period, especially if one is young, attracts the student of its own accord and takes possession of his whole personality' (Gramsci 1971: 383; Q 16, §2). For Gramsci, this deeply rooted drive in one's own biography sustains intellectual undertaking 'until such a time as a critical equilibrium is created and one learns to study deeply but without succumbing to the fascination of the system and the author under study' (ibid). Eroico furore, then, denotes a dialectical movement, a scholarly journey and a transformation, that yields an individuated and unique beginning. This beginning, as a point of departure, incorporates the particular and the immediate while aspiring to rise beyond them in its striving to form its own adequate conception of the world. Defying established authorities and existing systems of thought is an intrinsic feature of this form of endeavour.The papers in this special issue are products of an intellectual conversation on the contribution of Antonio Gramsci to critical thought and method that largely evolved out of close readings of Gramsci's notes. This conversation culminated in a workshop at the
University of Sydney on 29 May 2015 titled On 'Heroic Fury' and questions of method inAntonio Gramsci. In the workshop, Gramsci's eroico furore served as a leitmotif that brought together established and emerging researchers to discuss the relevance of Gramsci to their own intellectual concerns and research programs.Gramsci derives the eroico furore notion from the Italian Dominican friar, philosopher and cosmological theorist Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) who extended the conceptual reach THESIS ELEVEN 2 of the Copernican model. Bruno, a martyr of science for some, challenged the established authority of the Church, spent seven years in jail and was, ultimately, burned at the stake. The notion eroico furore encapsulates the affinity between the two prisoners, and links Gramsci and Bruno as militant thinkers who sought to extend our conception of the world. Gramsci's invocation of Bruno's notion is a reminder that critical knowledge is not about learning rules and deferring to authorities; rather it is about forming a transgressive intellectual attitude. This attitude is not content with repeating the explanations of established orthodoxies; rather it exerts itself to account for the complexity and contingency of social realities. What is really at stake here is not the coherence of positive social laws that aspire to provide universal explanations valid across time and space, but, instead, the integrity of practice and th...