2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international timetabling competition on sports timetabling (ITC2021)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For 34 out of 45 of the problem instances (about 80%), we found a feasible solution. Given the fact that finding finding feasible solutions is far from trivial (see Van Bulck and Goossens [13]) and that we only considered few HAP sets for which we solved the second phase, this is a remarkable result. We also find 10 new best solutions, even though over 15 internationally renowned research teams have already tackled these benchmark instances.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 34 out of 45 of the problem instances (about 80%), we found a feasible solution. Given the fact that finding finding feasible solutions is far from trivial (see Van Bulck and Goossens [13]) and that we only considered few HAP sets for which we solved the second phase, this is a remarkable result. We also find 10 new best solutions, even though over 15 internationally renowned research teams have already tackled these benchmark instances.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We coin the resulting framework first-break-heuristically-schedule (FBHS), and show the effectiveness of FBHS by using it to generate several new best solutions for the benchmark instances used by the International Timetabling Competition 2021 on sports timetabling (ITC2021). This benchmark set is diverse, challenging, and realistic (see [13]), and at the same time well studied by the scientific community, and therefore highly suited to evaluate the performance of our proposed method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, in many of these some similarities to our two problem formulations can be found. Without being near to a complete list, we like to mention the following publications in this context (in chronological order): [41], [22], [36], [46], [18], [38], [37], [34], [40], [2], [24], [21], [15], [10], [47], and [20]. We also like to mention that differennt contraint programming and SAT techniques may work well in some cases, as it is suggested in papers like [45] or [5].…”
Section: Integer Linear Programs For Other Sport Leaguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are in a general sense two sorts of restrictions, fragile restrictions, and troublesome objectives. Sensitive restrictions are those on the off chance that we harm them in arranging, the abdicate is still considerable, but troublesome objectives are those which on the off chance that we manhandle them; the timetable is no longer considerable [3]. The seen space of a timetabling issue is as well perpetual, various courses of action exist inside the seen space and few of them are not doable.…”
Section: Iiliterature Review Time Tablementioning
confidence: 99%