2021
DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of a segmentation challenge organized in 2019 showed that simpler models often perform on a par with larger and more complex models. 104…”
Section: Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of a segmentation challenge organized in 2019 showed that simpler models often perform on a par with larger and more complex models. 104…”
Section: Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). In the IWOAI 2019 knee segmentation challenge mentioned earlier, 8 the best performing meniscus segmentation model showed a DSC of 0.88. Using a fully automatic segmentation algorithm for the menisci based on 3D MRI acquisitions, Xu et al demonstrated that higher baseline meniscal volume and a stronger decrease in meniscal volume over time are associated with developing radiographic knee OA after 30 months in overweight and obese women.…”
Section: Automated Segmentation Morphological Analysis and Meniscal Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7 In the 2019 International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging (IWOAI) knee segmentation challenge, a standardized partition of the 3D DESS data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative was used to compare six different segmentation algorithms. 8 The highest Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs), a common metric to assess segmentation performance, for segmentation of femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively.…”
Section: Articular Cartilage Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U-Net has demonstrated high performance for lung segmentation from radiographs and bone segmentation from MRI in addition to many other tasks 42,43 . In this study, we did not compare different CNN architectures, but the results of a recent segmentation challenge showed similar performance between three-dimensional V-Net and three-dimensional U-Net models for a knee cartilage MRI segmentation task 44 . The application of CNN's and deep learning into medical imaging analysis has been a major advancement in the field, leading to significant gains in segmentation performance across multiple medical imaging applications (for a comprehensive review see Hesamian et al (2019)) 45 .…”
Section: Muscle Mfi (%)mentioning
confidence: 98%