2016
DOI: 10.1080/10669868.2016.1217721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Internationalization of Asian Firms: An Overview and Research Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current research contributes to the ongoing discussion regarding the role of different firm networks in the internationalization of SMEs (Bai et al, 2021; Paul, 2020), and the crucial role of dynamic capabilities in elevating performance (Helfat & Peteraf, 2003; Teece et al, 1997). More specifically, the current research advances our knowledge regarding the relationship between different types of networks on performance of SMEs (Blyler & Coff, 2003; Hsu & Wang, 2012; Watson, 2007); especially in developing economies that are under researched (Chandra et al, 2020; Hansen et al, 2018; Malca et al, 2021; Paul & Dikova, 2016). It is worth to mention that this study has shed the light on the impact of different networks on SMEs' internationalization, and differentiated among the roles of institutional networks, social networks, and interfirm networks that are otherwise treated as one construct in number of research (cf.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current research contributes to the ongoing discussion regarding the role of different firm networks in the internationalization of SMEs (Bai et al, 2021; Paul, 2020), and the crucial role of dynamic capabilities in elevating performance (Helfat & Peteraf, 2003; Teece et al, 1997). More specifically, the current research advances our knowledge regarding the relationship between different types of networks on performance of SMEs (Blyler & Coff, 2003; Hsu & Wang, 2012; Watson, 2007); especially in developing economies that are under researched (Chandra et al, 2020; Hansen et al, 2018; Malca et al, 2021; Paul & Dikova, 2016). It is worth to mention that this study has shed the light on the impact of different networks on SMEs' internationalization, and differentiated among the roles of institutional networks, social networks, and interfirm networks that are otherwise treated as one construct in number of research (cf.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In spite of the fact that SMEs in emerging economies face higher resource constraints compared to those in developed economies (Hansen et al, 2018), studying the role of networks in supporting the internationalization of SMEs in emerging economies has received lesser attention (Chandra et al, 2020; Malca et al, 2021; Menzies et al, 2020; Mishra et al, 2022; Paul & Dikova, 2016). It is noticeable though that there is increased attention toward studying African firms' internationalization (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of Asian enterprises that went global through foreign direct investment has grown by over 4% (UNCTAD, 2021). While economies such as India, China, and New Zealand have emerged as the world's rapidly expanding nations, countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam have experienced extraordinary growth, successfully transitioning from emerging to more advanced economies (Paul & Dikova, 2016). We argue that for BGFs from the APAC region to stay relevant and competitive, they must actively learn and adapt to the global and regional business environments and specific institutional contexts as they strive to launch and expand from the APAC to other locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the opportunities and benefits for SMEs in emerging markets to integrate into the global economy are considerable, the challenges that they face are significant. When compared with SMEs in developed countries, they are in general more disadvantaged vis-à-vis resources, technology and innovative brands (Paul and Dikova, 2016; Zhu et al, 2007). SMEs in emerging markets are also disadvantaged due to local institutional factors (Paul and Dikova, 2016; Zhu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with SMEs in developed countries, they are in general more disadvantaged vis-à-vis resources, technology and innovative brands (Paul and Dikova, 2016; Zhu et al, 2007). SMEs in emerging markets are also disadvantaged due to local institutional factors (Paul and Dikova, 2016; Zhu et al, 2007). Singh et al (2010) provide supporting evidence of the multitude of barriers that SMEs in emerging countries are likely to face, such as competitive disadvantages, political risks, corruption, poor marketing capabilities, restrictive regulatory frameworks, bureaucracy and poor infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%