The Interplay between Advertising and Society: An Historical Analysis

Abstract

As society has become more diverse and inclusive, so do the images portrayed in advertising. Using an historical research method, we gather data on political, legal, demographic, social, and cultural changes in American society, and changes in the content and messages of American advertising. We develop a framework to describe the process of how advertising and society interact. Our findings demonstrate that advertisers, in their efforts to reach their audiences, use images and language that are familiar and comfortable. Advertisers are also cautious not to alienate consumers and other stakeholders. We also suggest that marketers’ ethical obligation drives them to take a stakeholders perspective, particularly in advertising, resulting in messages that are more representative of society and at times attempt to influence society. Our study focuses on three areas of social interest: race (primarily African Americans), LGBTQ, and women’s roles as portrayed in advertising.

The Image of Female Ideal Body in Advertisements of the Slimming Product in Indonesia: A Critical Discourse Analysis

“…In this case, ideology is defined as "the mental frameworks, the languages, the concepts, categories, imagery of thought, and the systems of representation-which different classes and social groups deploy in order to make sense of, define, figure out and render intelligible the way society works" (Hall, 1986). This statement is in line with an opinion from McDonald et al (2020), in which advertisement is made depending on the background of its audience. Advertisement creator designs reasonable advertisement by relating what is shown and conveyed in the advertisement and the belief applicable in the society.…”

Brand approaches to diversity: a typology and research agenda

“…Francis and Robertson (2021) demonstrate that Black consumers often are charged inflated prices in real estate contexts. Yet most existing studies focus on specific marketing actions such as advertising (Licsandru and Cui, 2019; McDonald et al , 2020; Sternadori and Abitbol, 2019), which can spark criticism such as “woke-washing” when audiences perceive diversity claims as insubstantial-they contradict the brand’s narrative in other areas such as product design and their efforts do not productively address marketplace inequality (Mirzaei et al , 2022; Sobande, 2019). Excluding key marketing mix facets such as products (e.g.…”

“…While the above concepts might be interrelated with BATD, Table 2 highlights how they differ based on their critical success factors, characteristics, manifestations and outcomes. For example, some brands adopt diversity as a core value from the moment they were created, but others pursue such efforts only in response to societal pressures or after witnessing the success of other brands (McDonald et al , 2020). Comparatively, while concepts like brand activism are considered controversial (Vredenburg et al , 2020), BATD aligns with the notion of transformative branding, whereby brands might approach diversity to reflect or influence societal values (Spry et al , 2021).…”

How consumers react to woke advertising: methodological triangulation based on social media data and self-report data

“…Thus, when developing a woke ad, practitioners should be careful as to where it is placed and understand how the comment ranking algorithm used by a platform may shape the consumer sentiment. Otherwise, a woke ad that avidly promotes progressive values may look suspicious in terms of its intention and draw criticism for capitalizing on social issues, a phenomenon known as woke washing (McDonald et al, 2020;Quart, 2017).…”