2005
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class

Abstract: This evaluation study investigated the effects of a teacher-centered versus student-centered computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on 10th graders' earth science student learning outcomes. This study also explored whether the effects of different forms of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on student learning outcomes were influenced by student preferences of learning environment (PLE). A total of 347 10th-grade senior high school students participated in this nonequivalent control group quasiexperiment. During… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The study conducted by Hooper (1992) was coded as 50-99% because students in both the treatment and control conditions received 1½ hours of direct instruction prior to working with the computer-assisted instructional program (1½ hours). The study conducted by Chang and Tsai (2005) was coded as less than 50% because over the course of 1 week, students in both the treatment and control conditions engaged in equal parts of direct instruction, class discussion, and either presentations or self-paced learning via a computer-assisted instructional program. Table 5 describes the strength of the interactive and didactic pedagogical approaches, the nature of technology, and the level of technology saturation for each study.…”
Section: Technology Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted by Hooper (1992) was coded as 50-99% because students in both the treatment and control conditions received 1½ hours of direct instruction prior to working with the computer-assisted instructional program (1½ hours). The study conducted by Chang and Tsai (2005) was coded as less than 50% because over the course of 1 week, students in both the treatment and control conditions engaged in equal parts of direct instruction, class discussion, and either presentations or self-paced learning via a computer-assisted instructional program. Table 5 describes the strength of the interactive and didactic pedagogical approaches, the nature of technology, and the level of technology saturation for each study.…”
Section: Technology Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the study aims to gain insight in student variables that relate to possible changes in preferences. There are many studies investigating students’ preferences for education and characteristics of students that influence preferences at a single moment (see e.g., Chang & Tsai, 2005; Furnham & Chamorro‐Premuzic, 2005; Sadler‐Smith & Riding, 1999; Vermunt & Vermetten, 2004), but to our knowledge there is no research available about characteristics that influence the degree to which students’ preferences change over time. Therefore, a second aim of this study is to explore – for aspects that change over time – which learning‐related student characteristics predict later changes in preferences as well as relations between the change in preferences and students’ performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mastery of ICT knowledge and skills has been recognised as a significant and fundamental factor contributing to the implementation of ICT-integrated teaching in previous studies (e.g., Govender & Govender, 2009;Mahdizadeh, Biemans & Mulder, 2008;Sørebø, Halvari, Gulli & Kristiansen, 2009). However, in order to effectively enhance students' learning outcomes through ICT-integrated teaching, teachers need to further understand the interaction between the use of ICT, teaching pedagogies (Chang, 2003), students' characteristics (Chang & Tsai, 2005), and features of subject matter . In other words, any successful ICT-integrated teaching requires a comprehensive understanding of the mutually reinforcing relationships between technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and content knowledge (Angeli & Valanides, 2009;Chien, Chang, Yeh & Chang, 2012;Lee & Tsai, 2010;Jang & Chen, 2010;Koehler, Mishra & Yahya, 2007;Mishra & Koehler, 2006;Niess, 2005).…”
Section: In 2005 the Ministry Of Education (Moe) In Taiwan Enacted Tmentioning
confidence: 99%