2018
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interplay Between Working Memory and Background Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension

Abstract: R eading comprehension is a multifaceted process that requires intricate interaction among multiple skills and factors. Background knowledge is a well-known factor that influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies ask participants to recall the final words in the same order they were presented in the set (e.g., Adams & Shahnazari-Dorcheh, 2014;Chun & Payne, 2004) while others do not impose any restrictions (e.g., Joh, 2015;Leeser, 2007). Some studies have used a semantic judgment task to assess the processing function of WM, in which participants must decide if the sentence is semantically plausible (e.g., Shin et al, 2019;Tsai, 2014) whereas other studies used a grammatical judgment task (e.g., Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010;Bailer, 2011). In addition, studies tend to differ in terms of the length of sentences included in the RST, which can be found as short as 5 words (Zhang, 2015) and as long as 18 words (Choi, 2013).…”
Section: Potential Effects Of Task Types and Methodological Features mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies ask participants to recall the final words in the same order they were presented in the set (e.g., Adams & Shahnazari-Dorcheh, 2014;Chun & Payne, 2004) while others do not impose any restrictions (e.g., Joh, 2015;Leeser, 2007). Some studies have used a semantic judgment task to assess the processing function of WM, in which participants must decide if the sentence is semantically plausible (e.g., Shin et al, 2019;Tsai, 2014) whereas other studies used a grammatical judgment task (e.g., Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010;Bailer, 2011). In addition, studies tend to differ in terms of the length of sentences included in the RST, which can be found as short as 5 words (Zhang, 2015) and as long as 18 words (Choi, 2013).…”
Section: Potential Effects Of Task Types and Methodological Features mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also added that requiring verbal processing in the task as opposed to arithmetic processing (e.g., operation span task) can better distinguish between skilled and less skilled readers. Waters and Caplan's (1996) scoring system was later adopted by a few studies (e.g., Leeser, 2007;Shin, Dronjic, & Park, 2019). However, a more common system is the one that includes a storage task and a processing task without taking reaction times into account (e.g., Chun & Payne, 2004;Joh, 2015;Kozan, Erçetin, & Richardson, 2015;Osamu, 2006), and quite a number of studies still used the original method that relies only on the storage component (e.g., Bailer, 2011;Chun & Payne, 2004;Shibasaki, Tokimoto, Ono, Inuoe, & Tamaoka, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian ini menghubungkan antara memori bekerja dan kemampuan membaca. Memori yang digunakan bekerja untuk membaca (Shin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metodologiunclassified
“…Viewed as "the goal of reading" (Pugalee, 2015, p. 69) as well as "the heart of reading" (Moore & Hall, 2012, p. 24), reading comprehension is a key component in learning English as a foreign language (Ahmadi & Ismail, 2012). It is a multifaceted process (Shin, Dronjic, & Park, 2019) that involves transforming a text into thought or meaning (Kong, 2019). Therefore, it has a significant impact on academic achievement (Hunter, 2009).…”
Section: Background To the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%