2022
DOI: 10.1038/s44160-022-00108-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay of polar effects in controlling the selectivity of radical reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, apart from previous mechanistic studies, the activity of a XAT-based manifold under the reported reaction conditions is unlikely due to the highly reducing nature of the PCs and to the presence of a stoichiometric amount of acid. To confirm this finding, we selected a second photoreaction to evaluate the PCs under the ET reaction manifold, namely the photoreduction of trifluoromethylarenes (Figure b), employing 1,3-bistrifluoromethylbenzene 9 ( E red = −2.07 V vs SCE) as a model substrate with olefin 10 (for the reported mechanism see Section G of SI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, apart from previous mechanistic studies, the activity of a XAT-based manifold under the reported reaction conditions is unlikely due to the highly reducing nature of the PCs and to the presence of a stoichiometric amount of acid. To confirm this finding, we selected a second photoreaction to evaluate the PCs under the ET reaction manifold, namely the photoreduction of trifluoromethylarenes (Figure b), employing 1,3-bistrifluoromethylbenzene 9 ( E red = −2.07 V vs SCE) as a model substrate with olefin 10 (for the reported mechanism see Section G of SI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These types of photoreactions require an extremely reducing PC excited state. In fact, they classically proceed either under strong UV-light irradiation, or by relying on the photoexcitation of specific radical anions . While in previous reports, PTH 1 was used under UV-light irradiation (<380 nm), we compared the reaction performance of the designed PCs under visible light (427 nm) using both kinetics and final yields (see Section G of the SI, and Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, the bromine radical (Br·) relevant conditions 28 , 46 52 by using NiBr 2 ·DME as a nickel precatalyst (entry 2) or in the presence of an additional bromide (entry 5) led to unselective formation of both the α-amino and benzylic C−H acylation products in significantly lower yields. Chlorine-relevant conditions provided remarkably better reactivity and selectivity, likely benefiting from a thermodynamically facile (BDEs of H−Cl and H−Br: 103 kcal/mol vs 88 kcal/mol) and polarity-matched HAT process 40 . We attributed this regioselective difference to the better polarity matching of an α-amino C−H bond with Cl· than with Br· (local electrophilicity: 3.8 eV vs 3.6 eV) 44 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simultaneously achieve efficient site- and enantioselectivity in such a unified catalytic system, we have postulated three design elements to synergistically maximize the interplay of thermodynamic (enthalpic) and kinetic (polar) effects 40 : (i) the chlorine-radical-mediated HAT process should have a significant thermodynamic driving force due to the formation of a H−Cl bond (BDE: 103 kcal/mol) that is stronger than the most sp 3 C−H bonds (α-amino C−H bonds: BDE = 89−94 kcal/mol) 41 ; (ii) by taking advantage of polarity matching effect 42 , 43 , the strong electrophilic character of photoeliminated chlorine radicals (local electrophilicity of Cl·: 3.8 eV) should enable a kinetically selective HAT from the most hydridic C−H bonds in the presence of weaker C−H bonds that are less hydridic or polarity-mismatched 44 ; and (iii) the recognized ability of nickel catalysts to efficiently bind and stabilize alkyl radicals should render the cross-coupling of alkyl radicals with in situ-activated carboxylic acids enantioselective in the presence of an appropriate chiral ligand 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to types of organocatalysis (type I and type II in Scheme 1) reversible bonding and non-covalent interactions of redox-active molecules with a substrate are not very well studied and used. The selectivity in organocatalysis by redoxactive molecules is controlled mainly by bond energies, redoxpotentials, polar effects [157,158], and steric effects. Enantioselective transformations are relatively rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%