2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/221/1/012009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interpretation of CPTu, PMT, SPT and Cross-Hole Tests in Stiff Clay

Abstract: Abstract. The paper presents the comparison of results of CPTu, PMT, SPT and CH (crosshole) tests performed in stiff, heavily overconsolidated clay at a test location in Zagreb. This clay exhibits very high pore pressures generated during CPTu penetrations despite significant overconsolidation and relatively high values of shear strength and stiffness in its undisturbed, natural state. The clay is classified using the CPTu and CH test results in recently published soil classification charts based on the soil b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative analysis shows a slight discrepancy between the data, but the general nature of the formation of gas mixture components is similar for all [27][28][29][30][31][32]. It can also be noted that at an average process temperature of 1200°C, the calculation shows a greater amount of combustible components in the gas mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Comparative analysis shows a slight discrepancy between the data, but the general nature of the formation of gas mixture components is similar for all [27][28][29][30][31][32]. It can also be noted that at an average process temperature of 1200°C, the calculation shows a greater amount of combustible components in the gas mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Highly micro-structured soils could also be recognized in the interpretations and cemented aged or fissured clays. These materials can be recognized by a parameter called modified normalized small-strain rigidity index 𝐾𝐾 𝑔𝑔 * [30,31]. Examples of vertical profiles of the comparison between the CPT evaluated M′ and measured M′DMT 1D constrained modulus for two of the study sites are shown in Figure 17.…”
Section: Application Of Correlations For Calculating M Dmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) K* g = (G o /q t -s n )´(Q tn ) 0.75 (Kavur et al, 2019), където: Q tn е нормализирано съпротивление на конуса с отчитане на налягането в порите (MPa). Песъчливите почви, установени в изследваната площадка, попадат в интервала 100 < K g < 330, т.е.…”
Section: резултати и дискусияunclassified