2011
DOI: 10.1177/0149206310393503
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment

Abstract: This research contributes to institutional theory by examining the influence of informal institutions on formal institutions and the effects of formal institutions on inward foreign direct investment. In particular, the authors integrate prior research from multiple disciplines to identify and to examine the roles of a country’s formal regulatory, political, and economic institutions. The results suggest that the country’s informal institutions, in the form of the cultural dimensions of collectivism and future… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
409
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
(234 reference statements)
10
409
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, this study goes beyond the conventional constructs of country of origin and scrutinizes the roles of subnational region of origin in international business (Kirkman et al, 2017). The findings suggest the importance of research on integrating different dimensions of institutions (Holmes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, this study goes beyond the conventional constructs of country of origin and scrutinizes the roles of subnational region of origin in international business (Kirkman et al, 2017). The findings suggest the importance of research on integrating different dimensions of institutions (Holmes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Third, the study assesses if and how rapid upward and downward export expansions generate opposite effects on firm performance and complements the literature that has overly underscored the negative effects of institutional distance and associated concepts (Stahl, Tung, Kostova, & Zellmer-Bruhn, 2016). Fourth, this study advances institutional theory from a locational perspective by examining the joint effect of different aspects of institutions (Holmes, Miller, Hitt, & Salmador, 2013), namely heterogeneity in supranational institutional distance and heterogeneity in subnational institutional quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treating institutions as independent variables, the institution-based view "focuses on the dynamic interaction between institutions and organizations and considers strategic choices as the outcome of such an interaction" (Peng et al, 2009: 66; see also Ahuja & Yayavaram, 2011;Holmes et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2010;Van Essen et al, 2012). As a strategic choice, cross-listing can be viewed as the outcome of such an interaction.…”
Section: An Institution-based View On Cross-listingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The institution-based view distinguishes between formal institutions and informal institutions (Holmes et al, 2012;North, 1990;Peng et al, 2009). Emphasizing formal institutions, finance researchers investigating the legal bonding hypothesis tend not to focus on the impact of informal institutions (as critiqued by Licht, Li, & Siegel, 2011).…”
Section: An Institution-based View On Cross-listingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, using secondary data from various sources, Holmes, Miller, Hitt and Salmador (2013) show that informal institutions (e.g. in the form of the cultural dimensions of group collectivism and future orientation (GLOBE dimensions)) influence the formal institutions of a country.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%