2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-1978(99)00069-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interrelationships of Acanthomorph fishes: A total evidence approach using molecular and morphological data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A clade uniting Zeiformes (dories), Stylephorus (tube-eye), and Gadiformes (cods) is resolved with strong support (BS = 100%). Previous phylogenetic analyses had resolved Lampriformes (opahs) as the sister lineage of all other acanthomorphs (8,15,21,22), but our molecular phylogeny places the clade in a more derived position (BS = 99%) as the sister lineage of Acanthopterygii or the clade containing dories, tube-eyes, and cods ( Fig. 1B and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A clade uniting Zeiformes (dories), Stylephorus (tube-eye), and Gadiformes (cods) is resolved with strong support (BS = 100%). Previous phylogenetic analyses had resolved Lampriformes (opahs) as the sister lineage of all other acanthomorphs (8,15,21,22), but our molecular phylogeny places the clade in a more derived position (BS = 99%) as the sister lineage of Acanthopterygii or the clade containing dories, tube-eyes, and cods ( Fig. 1B and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, atheriniform fishes were considered to be composed of two monophyletic groups: Atherinopsidae, the New World silversides, and Atherinidae, the Old World silversides both of which have percoids and mugilids as sister-groups (Saeed et al, 1994;Dyer and Chernoff, 1996). Recently, Wiley et al (2000) in a comprehensive study about the interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes using molecular and morphological data, showed evidence corroborating the Stiassny's (1993) hypothesis that mullets are related to atherinomorphs. Even though there are many hypotheses for atherinomorphs relationship, our results only allow us to refute the hypothesis that atherinids are related to paracanthopterygians as previously suggested (Parenti, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Molecular data have been used recently as a source of information to elucidate phylogenetic history of fish groups using mitochondrial DNA and nuclear ribosomal sequences associated with morphological observations (Wiley et al, 2000). However, more appropriate nuclear genes may provide molecular data for more expressive phylogenetic reconstruction, since they meet several criteria to be used in this kind of analysis including (i) enough conservation of the sequence avoiding saturation; (ii) sufficient length; and (iii) minimal amount of homoplasy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). The only other molecular data pertaining to the question of stephanoberyciform/beryciform relationships are the 12S rDNA and 28S rDNA sequences presented by Wiley et al (2000) in their discussion of overall acanthomorph systematics. The three families (Melamphaidae, Berycidae, and Holocentridae) included in their study that are directly relevant here are, however, those whose placement is most controversial.…”
Section: Colgan Zhang and Paxtonmentioning
confidence: 99%