2017
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intersectionality framework and identity intersections in the Journal of Counseling Psychology and The Counseling Psychologist: A content analysis.

Abstract: The framework of is a powerful analytical tool for making sense of how interlocking systems of privilege and oppression are experienced by individuals and groups. Despite the long history of the concept, intersectionality has only recently gained attention in psychology. We conducted a content analysis to assess counseling psychology's engagement with an intersectional perspective. All articles published in the (n = 4,800) and (n = 1,915) from their first issues until July 2016 were reviewed to identify concep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In statistical terms, race and gender should be conceptualized as effect modifiers rather than confounders [ 57 ]. Conceptually, these findings and arguments are in line with the intersectionality framework [ 63 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In statistical terms, race and gender should be conceptualized as effect modifiers rather than confounders [ 57 ]. Conceptually, these findings and arguments are in line with the intersectionality framework [ 63 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In statistical terms, race, SES, and place should be conceptualized as effect modifiers (moderators) that change the direction or magnitude of the effects of risk and protective factors [ 106 ]. These findings advocate for application of the intersectionality framework to study experiences and vulnerabilities across each unique sub-section of the society [ 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of qualitative analysis is appropriate for this study because we were analyzing archival textual data from counseling licensing boards (Schreier, 2012; Stemler, 2001). Researchers in counseling have used this research methodology to explore textual data in the profession (e.g., Evans, 2013; Shin et al, 2017; Webber et al, 2017). This study was approved by the institutional review board at the authors’ university.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%