2009
DOI: 10.1075/aicr.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intersubjective Mirror in Infant Learning and Evolution of Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodologically, it should be emphasised that the data have been obtained by focusing on linguistic development within dialogue, not simply taking the output of the child or the input from the adult. The rationale is that in dialogue, language forms are "negotiated" between the child"s level and the speech of the adult and it is from these that the child extracts her input (Bråten, 2009;Goldstein et al, 2010;Veneziano, Sinclair & Berthoud, 1990;Veneziano, 2010). Recall that in the first example (Introduction), the second intervention of the girl would have been coded -as output a "Det.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologically, it should be emphasised that the data have been obtained by focusing on linguistic development within dialogue, not simply taking the output of the child or the input from the adult. The rationale is that in dialogue, language forms are "negotiated" between the child"s level and the speech of the adult and it is from these that the child extracts her input (Bråten, 2009;Goldstein et al, 2010;Veneziano, Sinclair & Berthoud, 1990;Veneziano, 2010). Recall that in the first example (Introduction), the second intervention of the girl would have been coded -as output a "Det.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They review a series of experiments that show that talking back and forth about a pair of pictures, with or without being able to see one's partner, lead to entrainment of postural sway. Finally, one can recall the work on early infant development by Trevarthen (1979Trevarthen ( , 1993, Trevarthen and Aitken (2001) and Bråten (1998Bråten ( , 2007Bråten ( , 2009, also mentioned by Linell. This body of literature shows how human dialogue arises as biology in action, rather than as a social activity that is grounded in the biological capacities for proto-dialogues.…”
Section: Self Other and The Interworlddor Why We Need Dialogical Sysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in several fields of research including social and cultural psychology, critical sociology and neuropsychology suggest that young children are biologically prepared for life and yet they are shaped by and completed through each person's active participation in socio-cultural environments and activities (Bråten, 2009; Stern, 2004) This provides postmodern research with the following ground rules: 1) To conduct research into the daily life of children -to theorize, investigate and experiment -is to interact simultaneously as an element of the phenomenon that is being investigated. 2) The daily life of the child materializes ontologically through the making of contextualized meaning.…”
Section: Department Of Curriculum Research the Danish School Of Educamentioning
confidence: 99%