Clinical relevance: The use of face masks has demonstrated to be an effective strategy to prevent transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Wearing face masks, mainly FFP2 (Filtering Face Piece 2) masks, during exercise practice has demonstrated to affect several physiological measures, but its impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) remains unknown.Background: This study was aimed at assessing the IOP behavior during the execution of the dynamic and isometric biceps-curl exercise with a surgical and FFP2 face mask.Methods: 22 physically active young adults performed sets of 10 repetitions against the 10-RM (repetition maximum) load and 1-minute isometric effort against a load 15% lower than the 10-RM load with the FFP2 and surgical mask and without any mask. A total of six exercise sets (3 experimental conditions [FFP2, surgical and control] × 2 exercise modalities) were performed. A rebound tonometer was used to measure IOP before, during (10 measurements), and after (30seconds of passive recovery) each training set.Results: At rest, there were not statistically significant IOP differences (p=0.222). During dynamic exercise, IOP showed a progressive IOP rise (p<0.001), observing a higher IOP response with the FFP2 than without mask (corrected p-value=0.003). For the isometric exercise, there was a greater IOP response as a function of accumulated effort (p<0.001), which was dependent of the face mask used (FFP2>surgical>control; corrected p-values<0.01).Conclusions: FFP2 masks cause a heightened IOP response during the execution of dynamic and isometric biceps-curl exercise, suggesting that, when possible, glaucoma patients may limit the use of FFP2 masks during resistance training.