2018
DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2018.1536230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The introduced terrestrial slugsAmbigolimax nyctelius(Bourguignat, 1861) andAmbigolimax valentianus(Férussac, 1821) (Gastropoda: Limacidae) in California, with a discussion of taxonomy, systematics, and discovery by citizen science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biodiversity documentation, by the means of aggregation of individual observations, is the main goal of iNaturalist. Consistent with this are the many examples of papers dealing with new noteworthy records of either alien (Vendetti et al 2018;Hiller and Haelewaters 2019;Liebgold 2019) or native organisms (Rosenberg 2018; Schuette et al 2018) made by amateur naturalists. Further accumulation of data made possible precise documentation of alien species distribution on a nationwide scale (Ciceoi et al 2017), their expansion process (Oficialdegui et al 2020), routine monitoring of invasive species (Larson et al 2020), documentation of at-risk species beyond the boundaries of protected areas (Young et al 2019) and a global assessment of species' extinction risk with the inclusion of citizen science data (Gardiner and Bachman 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Biodiversity documentation, by the means of aggregation of individual observations, is the main goal of iNaturalist. Consistent with this are the many examples of papers dealing with new noteworthy records of either alien (Vendetti et al 2018;Hiller and Haelewaters 2019;Liebgold 2019) or native organisms (Rosenberg 2018; Schuette et al 2018) made by amateur naturalists. Further accumulation of data made possible precise documentation of alien species distribution on a nationwide scale (Ciceoi et al 2017), their expansion process (Oficialdegui et al 2020), routine monitoring of invasive species (Larson et al 2020), documentation of at-risk species beyond the boundaries of protected areas (Young et al 2019) and a global assessment of species' extinction risk with the inclusion of citizen science data (Gardiner and Bachman 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…DNA barcoding was used to support specific identification of D. invadens, which mainly requires the analysis of genitalia by dissection to distinguish it from Deroceras laeve (Müller) [38,43,61]. Analysis of genitalia is also necessary for A. valentianus, to distinguish this species from Ambigolimax nyctelius (Bourguignat) [43,62]. In all cases, barcoding confirmed the morphological identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected through these platforms are made public and offer researchers, land managers, and educators different ways to be involved in research. Hundreds of natural history papers have used these data and filled knowledge gaps on changes in species abundance (Breed et al, 2013) and distribution (Gomes et al, 2019;Vendetti et al, 2019), biodiversity, plant and animal reproductive phenology (Chandler et al, 2017;Li et al, 2019), and have informed conservation actions (Robinson et al, 2018;Schuttler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Community Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%