1994
DOI: 10.2307/2404600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Introduction of Native Plant Species on Industrial Waste Heaps: A Test of Immigration and Other Factors Affecting Primary Succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, natural succession processes can support even more diverse fauna than artificial reclamation (Skubala, 2006) and self-sustaining rehabilitation via natural processes is regarded as a good ecological restoration (Dunger et al, 2001). Secondary succession is usually slow and incompatible with the societal requirements for rapid solutions (Ash et al, 1994;Bradshaw, 1997) whereas artificial reclamation procedures fulfill societal needs for fast recovery of damaged surfaces and its reuse by the local population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, natural succession processes can support even more diverse fauna than artificial reclamation (Skubala, 2006) and self-sustaining rehabilitation via natural processes is regarded as a good ecological restoration (Dunger et al, 2001). Secondary succession is usually slow and incompatible with the societal requirements for rapid solutions (Ash et al, 1994;Bradshaw, 1997) whereas artificial reclamation procedures fulfill societal needs for fast recovery of damaged surfaces and its reuse by the local population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-Cu communities have limited capacity to naturally recolonize areas disturbed by mining, not only due to the physical alteration of suitable soils and substrates (Ash et al 1994;Wong 2003;Yuan et al 2006) but also because tropical old-growth grassland species tend to have low success establishing from seed and poor colonization ability (Zaloumis and Bond 2011;Le Stradic et al 2014;Veldman et al 2015). Rather, they rely on strong resprouting capacity, investment in underground storage/root systems, and clonal growth (Veldman et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, they rely on strong resprouting capacity, investment in underground storage/root systems, and clonal growth (Veldman et al 2015). Lack of target species source, either in the seed bank or in the surrounding, may also limit the recolonization of degraded areas by native species, often to the benefit of ruderal and/or invasive species (Ash et al 1994;Bakker et al 1996;Bradshaw 1997;Bakker and Berendse 1999;Wilson 2002;Shu et al 2005;Kiehl 2010) Thus, active restoration is the only strategy for re-establishing Cu-Co communities in disturbed sites (Hutchings and Booth 1996;Bischoff 2002;Kiehl et al 2010), which imply, first, to conserve these communities and second, to develop techniques to restore its.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the humus substratum only, in the favorable climate under the trees there were forest species strictly protected by the Polish law: Epipactis atrorubens, E. helleborine as well as the partially protected Frangula alnus. Plant patches near the forest with rare species of orchids occurred also on the most advanced succession stages in post-mining dumps in the Upper Silesia Coalfield (CABA£A and SYPIEÑ 1987, CABA£A and JARZ¥BEK 1999, ROSTAÑSKI 2006), Lower Silesia Coalfield (KUCZYÑSKAet al 1984, as well as in post-mining dumps in England and Germany (ASH et al 1994, ESFELD et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%