The Intuitive Traditionalist

Eidelman, Scott; Crandall, Christian S.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00002-3

Cited by 42 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 187 publications

(214 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, people expect doctors to care for their patients and men not to wear high heels (Heilman, 2012;Levy, Taylor, & Gelman, 1995) and judge harshly those who do not meet these expectations (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004;Rudman, Moss-Racusin, Glick, & Phelan, 2012). Although adults tend to think that the way things are reflects how they ought to be (Eidelman & Crandall, 2014;Tworek & Cimpian, 2016), their representations of how categories are and how they should be are often dissociable. To illustrate, Knobe, Prasada, and Newman (2013) presented adults with vignettes that contrasted the two (e.g., participants were told about an individual who was employed as a scientist but who was not at all interested in the questions he was researching).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Normative Social Role Concepts in Early Childhood

Foster‐Hanson

Rhodes

2019

Cognitive Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current studies (N = 255, children ages 4–5 and adults) explore patterns of age‐related continuity and change in conceptual representations of social role categories (e.g., “scientist”). In Study 1, young children's judgments of category membership were shaped by both category labels and category‐normative traits, and the two were dissociable, indicating that even young children's conceptual representations for some social categories have a “dual character.” In Study 2, when labels and traits were contrasted, adults and children based their category‐based induction decisions on category‐normative traits rather than labels. Study 3 confirmed that children reason based on category‐normative traits because they view them as an obligatory part of category membership. In contrast, adults in this study viewed the category‐normative traits as informative on their own (not only as a cue to obligations). Implications for continuity and change in representations of social role categories will be discussed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Normative Social Role Concepts in Early Childhood

Foster‐Hanson

Rhodes

2019

Cognitive Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are thought to underlie the status quo bias (Eidelman & Crandall, 2012: the status quo is maintained simply because it already exists and outlasts other alternatives. Further, an option's being the status quo increases its likelihood and frequency of being exposed to the decision maker, and hence makes the person like the option more due to the mere-exposure effect (Eidelman & Crandall, 2014;Zajonc, 1968).…”

Section: Non-rational Accountsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The cognitive dissonance theory predicts that maintaining conflicting ideas or stances simultaneously is hard, and people strive continuously for consistency among their beliefs and behaviors (Festinger, 1962;Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959). Past choices can be informative of one's preferences (self-perception theory, e.g., Bem, 1972) and individuals are inclined to find or even fabricate reasons in support of, i.e., rationalize, their decisions (Brehm, 1956;Eyster, 2002;Eidelman & Crandall, 2014). Collectively, these factors drive people to stick with status quo options and even find them reasonable, desirable, and just (Jost et al, 2004;Kay et al, 2009), so that the validity of their reasoning is affirmed, and a level of behavioral consistency gets maintained.…”

Section: Non-rational Accountsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The status quo option, i.e., the color option that the wagon dealer said to be the only one available, was more compelled rather than an autonomous choice. The abandonment of such a choice (for switching to an alternative), therefore, would produce minimal cognitive dissonance that was thought to be a reason why many would maintain and defend the status quo (Festinger, 1962;Jost et al, 2004;Kay et al, 2009;Eidelman & Crandall, 2014). Also, given that in Scenario 2, one was yet to own the wagon when he or she was to make the decision whether to switch to a nonstatus quo color option, loss aversion would play no or minimal role in leading to the status quo bias.…”

Section: Factors Affecting Status Quo Biasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…People supposedly exhibit the status quo bias when they perceive the status quo option as reflecting their own preferences and needs (Bem, 1972;Eidelman & Crandall, 2014). The need for consistency drives us towards the maintenance of the status quo.…”

Section: Factors Affecting Status Quo Biasmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Revisiting status quo bias: Replication of Samuelson and Zeckhauser (1988)

Xiao¹,

LAM²,

Piara³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Authorship declarationGilad supervised each step in the project, conducted the pre-registrations, and ran data collection. Muhrajan Piara initiated the project, designed and analyzed the first phase of this replication project, as part of his masters dissertation. Choi Shan Lam reviewed and reanalyzed the first phase of the replication and then initiated, designed, and analyzed the data from the second phase. Qinyu Xiao reviewed the pre-registrations and verified all data analyses and drafted the manuscript. Gilad and Qinyu finalized the manuscript for submission. Status quo bias: Replication 3 Additional informationThe current replication is part of the larger "mass pre-registered replications in judgment and decision-making" project led by Gilad Feldman. The project aims to revisit well known research findings in the area of judgment and decision-making (JDM) and investigate the replicability of these findings. More information is available on: http://mgto.org/pre-registered-replications/ Status quo bias: Replication 4 Abstract Status quo bias refers to people's general preference to stick to, or continue with, a previously chosen option. In two pre-registered American online Amazon Mechanical Turk data collections (N1 = 311, N2 = 316), we attempted to replicate four decision scenarios from , the classic article that provided first experimental demonstration of the status quo bias. We found strong empirical support for the status quo bias in three decision scenarios: budget allocation (Question 1), investment portfolios (Question 2), and college job offers (Question 4). However, we failed to find conclusive support for the wagon color choices scenario (Question 6). We discuss implications of our results and possible explanations using multiple accounts suggested in the status quo bias literature. Keywords: status quo bias, judgment and decision making, replicationStatus quo bias: Replication 5 Revisiting status quo bias:Replication of

show abstract

Greentopia: Methods of Environmental Imagination in the Anthropocene

Kallhoff,

Liedauer

2024

The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Intuitive Traditionalist

Cited by 42 publications

References 187 publications

Normative Social Role Concepts in Early Childhood

Normative Social Role Concepts in Early Childhood

Revisiting status quo bias: Replication of Samuelson and Zeckhauser (1988)

Greentopia: Methods of Environmental Imagination in the Anthropocene

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About