1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf01614096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invariance of theS-matrix under point transformations in renormalized perturbation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our final result is then in accordance with the result in [11] which was obtained in coordinate space renormalization: invariance under point transformation for a theory renormalized by local subtractions.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our final result is then in accordance with the result in [11] which was obtained in coordinate space renormalization: invariance under point transformation for a theory renormalized by local subtractions.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Note that the missing k = 1 term in the first sum of (10) would be exactly b ′ n so the recurrence (10) is equivalent to (11)…”
Section: Bell Polynomial Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.9), only the original vertices remain, resulting in the same Feynman graphs as in the underlying theory. Theorem 3.9 is the graph-theoretic version of the result found in [7]. The key mechanism is very similar: A diffeomorphism gives rise to contributions proportional to the offshell-variables of the correlation functions under consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…To conclude Section 3, we store this result in a theorem: Theorem 3.13 is the graph-theoretic version of the result found in [8]. The key mechanism is very similar: A diffeomorphism gives rise to contributions proportional to the offshell-variables of the correlation functions under consideration.…”
Section: Loop Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…If instead of Eq. 5.1 the underlying Lagrangian density is 8) additionally the vertices −iw (t) n given by Eq. 3.2 are present.…”
Section: Interacting Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%