2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0097-3165(02)00023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invariant factors of some cyclic difference sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more general decomposition result for group ring elements is proved by Leung and Schmidt [81]. Applications of this decomposition result include the nonexistence of circulant Hadamard matrices of order v with 4 < v < 548, 964, 900 and the nonexistence of Barker sequences of length with 13 < < 10 22 . For more details, we refer the reader to [81].…”
Section: Conjecture 32 (Landermentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A more general decomposition result for group ring elements is proved by Leung and Schmidt [81]. Applications of this decomposition result include the nonexistence of circulant Hadamard matrices of order v with 4 < v < 548, 964, 900 and the nonexistence of Barker sequences of length with 13 < < 10 22 . For more details, we refer the reader to [81].…”
Section: Conjecture 32 (Landermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The following lemma is very useful for determining the SNF of (v, k, ) difference sets with gcd(v, k βˆ’ ) = 1. [22]). Let G be an abelian group of order v, let p be a prime not dividing v, and let P be a prime ideal in Z[ v ] lying above p, where v is a complex primitive vth root of unity.…”
Section: Problem 92 Is It Possible To Give a Proof Of Hamada's Conjmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, nonisomorphic designs sometimes have the same p-rank. In such a situation, one can try to prove nonisomorphism of designs by comparing the Smith normal forms of the incidence matrices [8]. Therefore it is of interest to find Smith normal forms of incidence matrices of designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%