2023
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/r6bw9
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of Validity in the United States and India

Abstract: Researchers increasingly recognize that the mind and culture interact at many levels to constitute our lived experience, yet we know relatively little about the extent to which culture shapes the way people appraise their experiences and the likelihood that a given experience will be reported. Experiences that involve claims regarding deities, extraordinary abilities, and/or psychopathology offer an important site for investigating the interplay of mind and culture at the population level. Due to the siloing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of validity evidence is often gathered by consulting experts or relevant literature (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014;Lissitz, 2009;Sireci, 1998) but this does not guarantee that the items are relevant to participants, especially when researchers seek to measure psychological properties that are more ontologically subjective or culturally specific. If researchers intend to use the survey instrument to make cross-cultural comparisons or administer the survey to participants from a different culture, then the entire RPE process should be repeated using participants from that group to ensure it is cross-culturally sound (for more information, see Wolf et al, 2022 andTaves et al, 2023).…”
Section: The Response Process Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of validity evidence is often gathered by consulting experts or relevant literature (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014;Lissitz, 2009;Sireci, 1998) but this does not guarantee that the items are relevant to participants, especially when researchers seek to measure psychological properties that are more ontologically subjective or culturally specific. If researchers intend to use the survey instrument to make cross-cultural comparisons or administer the survey to participants from a different culture, then the entire RPE process should be repeated using participants from that group to ensure it is cross-culturally sound (for more information, see Wolf et al, 2022 andTaves et al, 2023).…”
Section: The Response Process Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we elect to demonstrate the validation process only for Englishspeaking Americans, but the process can be expanded to validate items simultaneously in multiple languages. Readers that are interested in detail about the cross-cultural validation process are referred to Taves et al (2023).…”
Section: Using the Rpe Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%