2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverse convex ordered 1-median problem on trees under Chebyshev norm and Hamming distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning this purpose, the ordered median function was coined by Nickel and Puerto [19] to generalize a class of functions, where the median and the center functions are among them. Then, the inverse ordered median location problem was also taken into account, for instance, in [20,21,22,23]. The following facts motivates further research on the topic of inverse combinatorial optimization with universal objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Concerning this purpose, the ordered median function was coined by Nickel and Puerto [19] to generalize a class of functions, where the median and the center functions are among them. Then, the inverse ordered median location problem was also taken into account, for instance, in [20,21,22,23]. The following facts motivates further research on the topic of inverse combinatorial optimization with universal objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They showed the NP-completeness of the problem on cactus graphs and then developed linear time algorithms to solve the problem on cycles and on trees. Additionally, the inverse location problem was investigated with complexity result and efficient solution approach; for example, [1,9,10,[19][20][21], to mention a few. On a counter part, the reverse optimization problem on a network aims to modify parameters within a given budget so that the behavior network is improved as much as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a special case of variable-sized robust optimization, we consider the following question: Given only a nominal problem (P) with objective ĉ, how large can an uncertainty set become, such that the nominal solution still remains optimal for the resulting robust problem? Due to the similarity in our question to inverse optimization problems, see, e.g., [AO01,Heu04,ABP09,NC15] we denote this as the inverse perspective to robust optimization. The approach from [CN03] is remotely related to our perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%