2019
DOI: 10.1177/1477153519871324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverse square law in metrology considering a finite photosensitive area

Abstract: In the field of photometry, an inverse square law is often used in which the illuminance value is inversely proportional to the square of the photometric distance. It is well known that this is a rule that assumes that the light source is a point light source. In this research, it is shown by model simulation that the inverse square law cannot be applied with high accuracy depending on the distance and the size of the light-receiving area even in the case of a point light source. Also, when checked experimenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with such a dedicated meter, parallax errors cannot be avoided, as shown throughout Section 3, let alone with irregular objects. Another source of error is the finite photosensitive area of the illuminance meter, 25 which in this study is assumed to be infinitely small. In other words, only the centre of the photosensitive area is considered in the calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with such a dedicated meter, parallax errors cannot be avoided, as shown throughout Section 3, let alone with irregular objects. Another source of error is the finite photosensitive area of the illuminance meter, 25 which in this study is assumed to be infinitely small. In other words, only the centre of the photosensitive area is considered in the calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, the photosensitive area of the receiver is assumed to be infinitely small. Shibuya et al 25 have elaborated the potential errors due to finite photosensitive area illuminated by a point light source. When the measurement distance is five times the radius of the photosensitive area, the resulting error is approximately 3%.…”
Section: Observed Scenementioning
confidence: 99%