2019
DOI: 10.1080/10530789.2019.1688540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invisibility of rural homelessness in a canadian context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The small group of individuals known to police and community leaders were highly visible in the community but did not represent this range of individuals struggling with access to a suitable shelter. This is consistent with a growing body of literature demonstrating the most consistent feature of rural homelessness is its invisibility (Carpenter‐Song et al., 2016; Gibbons et al., 2019; Kauppi et al., 2017; MacDonald & Gaulin, 2019; Waegemakers Schiff et al., 2016; Yousey & Samudra, 2018). The lack of infrastructure in a rural setting, including shelters and warming centres, means many people facing homelessness rely on informal networks and strategies that hide them from public view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The small group of individuals known to police and community leaders were highly visible in the community but did not represent this range of individuals struggling with access to a suitable shelter. This is consistent with a growing body of literature demonstrating the most consistent feature of rural homelessness is its invisibility (Carpenter‐Song et al., 2016; Gibbons et al., 2019; Kauppi et al., 2017; MacDonald & Gaulin, 2019; Waegemakers Schiff et al., 2016; Yousey & Samudra, 2018). The lack of infrastructure in a rural setting, including shelters and warming centres, means many people facing homelessness rely on informal networks and strategies that hide them from public view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The intersectional nature of stigma can worsen this experience, with negative attitudes that are particularly problematic if individuals have more than one stigmatising condition such as homelessness, mental illness, addiction, and low socioeconomic status (McGinty & Barry, 2020). This stigma translated into participants' perception that members of the community didn't care about them, consistent with the sense of rejection, shame, and isolation experienced by people experiencing homelessness in other rural settings (Carpenter-Song et al, 2016;MacDonald & Gaulin, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In California, single‐headed households (typically led by mothers) with two to three children have seen a modest increase in family homelessness over the past decade (Institute for Social Research, 2017). Most research on family homelessness and interventions focus on concentrated urban areas (Biel et al, 2014; Shinn et al, 2015, see exceptions Brott et al, 2019; MacDonald & Gaulin, 2019). Comparing experiences across rural and urban transitional housing settings provides a deeper understanding of the differences and similarities in needs, resources, services and support for homeless families residing in rural areas compared to urban communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%