2017
DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2017.1286406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invisible hand: designing curriculum in the afterward

Abstract: is a lecturer in the school of Education at Deakin University. She has a BA in Fine Arts, an MA in Media, Culture and Communication, and a PhD in Education. Her research interests are in the transdisciplinary studies of curriculum design and creative research methodologies. She is also a qualified teacher of Creative Writing and award-winning writer and playwright. David Rousell is a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Southern Cross University. David's transdisciplinary doctoral project collectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our reading-writing-thinking-together-apart amplifies the scars, ubiquitous in any writing, where visual and semiotic gashes provoke discord; evidence of the disharmonious connections, unresolved dissonances and tensionalities of incomplete fusions. While we understand that we are not the first to perform a collective -or even a monstrous -coming-to-know (see for example Charteris et al, 2019;Gannon et al, 2014;McKnight et al, 2017;Riddle et al, 2018), we hope that our wor(l)ding of literary and scholarly voices -shot through with multimodal metaphors and -22 -gothic madness -might function to grow further possibilities for how post-qualitative research might be enacted. In emerging, our creature has given us a glimpse of what the future might look like.…”
Section: Eschewing Endings For Entrailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reading-writing-thinking-together-apart amplifies the scars, ubiquitous in any writing, where visual and semiotic gashes provoke discord; evidence of the disharmonious connections, unresolved dissonances and tensionalities of incomplete fusions. While we understand that we are not the first to perform a collective -or even a monstrous -coming-to-know (see for example Charteris et al, 2019;Gannon et al, 2014;McKnight et al, 2017;Riddle et al, 2018), we hope that our wor(l)ding of literary and scholarly voices -shot through with multimodal metaphors and -22 -gothic madness -might function to grow further possibilities for how post-qualitative research might be enacted. In emerging, our creature has given us a glimpse of what the future might look like.…”
Section: Eschewing Endings For Entrailsmentioning
confidence: 99%