Although many researchers have documented men's tendency to misperceive women's friendliness as a sign of sexual interest, few have examined individual differences in men's attitudes and past experiences that might predict their likelihood of making these types of misjudgments. We applied an expanded version of Malamuth, Sockloskie, Koss, and Tanaka's (1991) Confluence model to predict frequency of misperception of women's sexual intent with a sample of 356 male college students. Using structural equation modeling, hostile masculinity, impersonal sex, and drinking in dating and sexual situations predicted men's frequency of misperception. Furthermore, the more risk factors men possessed, the more times they misperceived women's sexual intentions. Suggestions are made for theory development and future research incorporating situational as well as personality measures in longitudinal studies.Keywords sexual perception; misperception of sexual intent; sexual assault; Confluence model; alcohol Both women and men frequently report that their sexual intentions have been misperceived by someone of the opposite sex, although substantially more women than men report that their level of sexual interest was overperceived (Abbey, 1987;Haselton, 2003;Koss & Oros, 1982). For example, Koss and Oros (1982) found that 70% of the female and 53% of the male college students in their survey reported that the level of sexual intimacy they desired from a member of the opposite sex had been misperceived at least once. Similarly, Abbey (1987, Study 1) found that 72% of college women and 60% of college men reported that Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be sent to Angela J. Jacques-Tiura, Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward, Detroit, MI 48202; ajacques@wayne.edu.
HHS Public Access
Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript someone of the opposite sex had misperceived their friendliness as a sexual come-on. Among those students who had been misperceived, the average number of misperceptions was 4.8. These findings are typically explained in terms of the ambiguous meaning of many nonverbal and verbal cues (P. A. Anderson, 1985;Fichten, Tagalakis, Judd, Wright, & Amsel, 1992;Kowalski, 1993). People may be signaling sexual interest when they smile, stand close, give a compliment, or pat someone of the opposite sex on the arm; however, they also may be signaling friendship or attention. The multiple meanings associated with flirtatious cues contribute to frequent misunderstandings, particularly early in an interaction (Henningsen, 2004;Koeppel, Montagne-Miller, O'Hair, & Cody, 1993).Although most misperceptions of sexual intent are quickly resolved, they have been linked to men's perpetration of sexual assault and sexual harassment (Abbey, 1987;Abbey, McAuslan, & Ross, 1998;Stockdale, 1993). The primary purpose of this article is to determine the extent to which the Confluence model (Malamuth, Sockloskie, Koss, & Tanaka, 1991), which has been used to predict colle...