2023
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1264322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The involvement of brain regions associated with lower KPS and shorter survival time predicts a poor prognosis in glioma

Hongbo Bao,
Huan Wang,
Qian Sun
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma (IDH-wildtype GBM) and IDH-mutant astrocytoma have distinct biological behaviors and clinical outcomes. The location of brain tumors is closely associated not only with clinical symptoms and prognosis but also with key molecular alterations such as IDH. Therefore, we hypothesize that the key brain regions influencing the prognosis of glioblastoma and astrocytoma are likely to differ. This study aims to (1) identify specific regions that are associated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the extent and nature of neuroplastic changes are likely influenced by the tumor's location, size, and grade. Tumors in certain brain regions may disrupt local neural networks to an extent that limits the potential for nearby or connected regions to adapt and compensate (Bao et al, 2023 ). Additionally, the individual variability in brain anatomy and functional organization could result in differing capacities for neuroplasticity, where some patients exhibit robust compensatory changes while others do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the extent and nature of neuroplastic changes are likely influenced by the tumor's location, size, and grade. Tumors in certain brain regions may disrupt local neural networks to an extent that limits the potential for nearby or connected regions to adapt and compensate (Bao et al, 2023 ). Additionally, the individual variability in brain anatomy and functional organization could result in differing capacities for neuroplasticity, where some patients exhibit robust compensatory changes while others do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%