2013
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10126820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Involvement of Girls and Boys with Bullying: An Analysis of Gender Differences

Abstract: This exploratory and cross-sectional study aimed to identify the prevalence of bullying in a group of students and analyze the data regarding the gender of those involved in the violence. A questionnaire adapted from Olweus was applied in seven elementary education schools in Portugal. The sample consisted of 387 students between 7 and 14 years old. Data are presented in terms of descriptive statistics and differences between proportions were analyzed using chi-square tests. The gender analysis of victimizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
2
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
52
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, practitioners working with victims of bullying in middle schools (e.g., school psychologists, counselors, and social workers) might assess students' social activities, both offline and online, and develop and implement a bully prevention training for students throughout their schooling as they move through grade levels. Moreover, because males are more prone to both face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying than females, practitioners need to implement strategies that consider gender relations as a priority for prevention and intervention in bullying situations (Silva, Pereira, Mendonca, Nunes, & de Oliveira, 2013). As our findings also indicate, adolescents who spent more hours on social media were at an increased risk of both face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, practitioners working with victims of bullying in middle schools (e.g., school psychologists, counselors, and social workers) might assess students' social activities, both offline and online, and develop and implement a bully prevention training for students throughout their schooling as they move through grade levels. Moreover, because males are more prone to both face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying than females, practitioners need to implement strategies that consider gender relations as a priority for prevention and intervention in bullying situations (Silva, Pereira, Mendonca, Nunes, & de Oliveira, 2013). As our findings also indicate, adolescents who spent more hours on social media were at an increased risk of both face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, comparison of such results with the results of other authors is complicated because the researches point out discrepant results. Though many researchers state that boys of different age should be considered as being at risk for involvement in bullying both as bullies, and as victims (Smith, 2016;Jormanainen et al, 2014;Iossi Silva et al, 2013;etc. ), other researches tend to distinguish girls as the ones more often suffering from bullying (Malecki et al, 2015;Schneider et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de lo anterior, los puntos de corte fueron proporcionados tomando en consideración tanto el sexo como el nivel educativo, debido a que son variables que influyen en la prevalencia de la expresión de victimización entre pares en ambientes escolares (Barlett y Coyne, 2014;Chapell et al, 2006;Iossi Silva, Pereira, Mendonça, Nunes, y Oliveira, 2013;Sentse, Kretschmer, y Salmivalli, 2015). Los puntos de corte se utilizaron para ofrecer un diagnóstico breve y normativo de conductas de victimización por pares en el ambiente escolar, por lo que se reportan las prevalencias según estos puntos de corte.…”
Section: Procedimientounclassified