2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2014.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IO and OI hierarchies revisited

Abstract: We study languages of λ-terms generated by IO and OI unsafe grammars. These languages can be used to model meaning representations in the formal semantics of natural languages following the tradition of Montague. Using techniques pertaining to the denotational semantics of the simply typed λ-calculus, we show that the emptiness and membership problems for both types of grammars are decidable. In the course of the proof of the decidability results for OI, we identify a decidable variant of the λ-definability pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some of the analogous results have recently been obtained for unsafe grammars (those without the safety restriction) [16,7,14], many problems still remain open, such as the context-sensitiveness of higher-order languages. This is a pity, as many of the recent applications of higher-order grammars make use of unsafe ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although some of the analogous results have recently been obtained for unsafe grammars (those without the safety restriction) [16,7,14], many problems still remain open, such as the context-sensitiveness of higher-order languages. This is a pity, as many of the recent applications of higher-order grammars make use of unsafe ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We now take the monotone applicative structure (see [21,24]) M = (Mα)α∈Sorts where Mo is the two element lattice, with maximal element ⊤ and minimal element ⊥. Intuitively, ⊤ means nonempty language and ⊥ means empty language.…”
Section: Lemma A2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to define the semantics [[M, χ, ν]] of a term given a valuation χ for nonterminals and ν for variables Least fixed point models of schemes induce an interpretation on infinite trees by finite approximations. An infinite tree has value ⊤ iff it represents a non-empty language [21]. The important point is that the semantics of a term and that of the infinite tree generated from the term coincide.…”
Section: Lemma A2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation