2014
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2014.970866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The iron law of Erdogan: the decay from intra-party democracy to personalistic rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, EU integration would prove difficult to achieve, as religious, political, and cultural issues were factors that made it harder for Turkey to become a member. For Zürcher (2017, p. 367), “the increasingly religious tone of the Erdoğan government contributed to the European unease,” as well as the increasingly undemocratic pathway the country proceeded down (Lancaster, 2014). Likewise, with the rise of far‐right parties in Europe, mainly post‐2008 crisis, and the consequent anti‐immigrant and anti‐Islam sentiment (Todorov, 2010), there was a growing opposition against Turkey's entry into the EU.…”
Section: A Turn To the Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, EU integration would prove difficult to achieve, as religious, political, and cultural issues were factors that made it harder for Turkey to become a member. For Zürcher (2017, p. 367), “the increasingly religious tone of the Erdoğan government contributed to the European unease,” as well as the increasingly undemocratic pathway the country proceeded down (Lancaster, 2014). Likewise, with the rise of far‐right parties in Europe, mainly post‐2008 crisis, and the consequent anti‐immigrant and anti‐Islam sentiment (Todorov, 2010), there was a growing opposition against Turkey's entry into the EU.…”
Section: A Turn To the Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admittedly, today's Turkey does not conform faithfully, and I do not dispute recent elections and referenda. Figuring prominently in past characterizations of southern European authoritarianism (e.g., from O'Donnell et al., to Söyler, ), since May 2013, Turkey again features in accounts as authoritarian, totalitarian, sultan‐like, or otherwise dictatorial and antidemocratic (e.g., Akyol, ; Economist, ; Iğsız, ; Kandiyoti, ; Lancaster, ; Tuğal, ; Yeşil, ). Indeed, today's Turkey conforms clearly through its authoritarian conduct at executive scales with negligible effective checks at judicial and legislative scales, and it justifies routinely diminishing citizens’ rights through majority votes at legislative and national/general scales.…”
Section: Democratic Authoritarianism and Graffiti In Erdoğan's Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also since 2013, and especially 2016, the state labels routinely criticism of all sorts – including graffiti – as terroristic. In 2013 and since, academics, journalists and NGOs also evaluated Gezi in terms of civil society, social mobilization, public space and social media struggles, urban politics, occupy movements, neoliberalism, civil liberties, human rights, and repression and resistance under democracy (e.g., Akçalı & Korkut, ; Amnesty International, , ; Batuman, ; Catterall, ; Göle, ; Gürcan & Peker, ; Lancaster, ; Musil, ; Özkırımlı, ; Turam, ). Graffiti conveyed protesters’ diverse concerns – often inventively, with caricatures, biting satire and vulgar yet trenchant humour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an extension of the unreserved personalisation of power around a single man, a charismatic authority has been established, which is surrounded by such forms of address as "master", "leader", "strong will", "tall man", "chief", and "the president of the people", "commander in chief", "leader of the Muslim World" and "the hope of the ummah" (Gürsel 2014). AKP has become a vehicle for the cult Unauthenticated Download Date | 5/12/18 7:25 PM of Erdoğan's persona and Erdoğan has become key to the existence of a neo-patrimonial AKP (Lancaster 2014(Lancaster , 1680. One reason why Erdoğan appears to be immune to accusations of fraud and corruption is that his cult of personality remains so pervasive and uncontested amongst his supporters (Lancaster 2014(Lancaster , 1684.…”
Section: Emergence Of the Islamist Autocracy (2013-)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AKP has become a vehicle for the cult Unauthenticated Download Date | 5/12/18 7:25 PM of Erdoğan's persona and Erdoğan has become key to the existence of a neo-patrimonial AKP (Lancaster 2014(Lancaster , 1680. One reason why Erdoğan appears to be immune to accusations of fraud and corruption is that his cult of personality remains so pervasive and uncontested amongst his supporters (Lancaster 2014(Lancaster , 1684.…”
Section: Emergence Of the Islamist Autocracy (2013-)mentioning
confidence: 99%