2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00622.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Irrational Economist: Making decisions In A Dangerous World by Erwann Michel‐Kerjan and Paul Slovic (eds.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, it highlights the relevance of public perception for disaster risk reduction strategies. The predisposition to fear certain types of risks often pushes the public to take action and demand public interventions toward specific threats (Sunstein 2005, 100;Vogel 2012) while disregarding others (Michel-Kerjan and Slovic 2010). In this context, scientific evidence (where available) intersects with irrational images, as shown by the social stigma attached to the Black Death epidemic of the fourteenth century and the ongoing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic.…”
Section: A Risk Governance Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, it highlights the relevance of public perception for disaster risk reduction strategies. The predisposition to fear certain types of risks often pushes the public to take action and demand public interventions toward specific threats (Sunstein 2005, 100;Vogel 2012) while disregarding others (Michel-Kerjan and Slovic 2010). In this context, scientific evidence (where available) intersects with irrational images, as shown by the social stigma attached to the Black Death epidemic of the fourteenth century and the ongoing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic.…”
Section: A Risk Governance Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a growing segment of the research community is turning to behavioral economics to understand systematic deviations from economic predictions of adaptation (Gowdy, 2008). This entails testing the underlying theories experimentally in an applied setting (Pieterman, 2010), i.e., testing risk perception biases and their corrective measures in a climate change adaptation context. Such testing requires effective frameworks that can ensure a simple and efficient experiment design, program implementation and data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%