2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Irvine–Minnesota Inventory to Measure Built Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
199
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
199
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…(Pivo and Fisher 2011, 186) Similarly Lo's (2009, 163) paper exploring the issue of walkability concludes by partially defining it in terms of measures, specifically in terms of "factors that appear in a number of different walkability measures or metric[s]…" including sidewalk presence and maintenance, universal access, directness and connectivity, safety (at grade crossings, traffic, buffering), land use, landscaping, aesthetics, and security (perceived and actual crime). Leinberger and Alfonzo (2012) use the observational tool, the Irvine Minnesota Inventory, to propose a related list dealing with aesthetics, connectivity, density, form, pedestrian amenities, personal safety, recreational facilities, land uses, public spaces, and traffic measures (Leinberger and Alfonzo 2012, 6; also Boarnet et al 2006;Day et al 2006;Leinberger 2012). Some measures rely on perceptions.…”
Section: Multidimensional and Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Pivo and Fisher 2011, 186) Similarly Lo's (2009, 163) paper exploring the issue of walkability concludes by partially defining it in terms of measures, specifically in terms of "factors that appear in a number of different walkability measures or metric[s]…" including sidewalk presence and maintenance, universal access, directness and connectivity, safety (at grade crossings, traffic, buffering), land use, landscaping, aesthetics, and security (perceived and actual crime). Leinberger and Alfonzo (2012) use the observational tool, the Irvine Minnesota Inventory, to propose a related list dealing with aesthetics, connectivity, density, form, pedestrian amenities, personal safety, recreational facilities, land uses, public spaces, and traffic measures (Leinberger and Alfonzo 2012, 6; also Boarnet et al 2006;Day et al 2006;Leinberger 2012). Some measures rely on perceptions.…”
Section: Multidimensional and Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'autres audits sont dérivés de SPACES, pour le perfectionner ou l'adapter. Ainsi, le Irvine-Minesota Inventory (IMI) s'intéresse aux facteurs de l'environnement bâti qui favorisent les modes de vie actifs (Day et al, 2006). Il intègre des facteurs liés à l'accessibilité, ainsi qu'à la perception de la sécurité et de l'attraction des environnements.…”
Section: Des Audits Urbains Pour éValuer La Marchabilitéunclassified
“…Os domínios mais comumente incluídos são ambiente físico 31,32,33,34 , disponibilidade de locais/equipamentos para lazer e atividade física 26,27,28,29,30 , segurança 31,32,33 , estética 28,29 , incivilidade física 26,28 , quantidade de destinos 27,32 , características de ocupação do solo 29,34 e tráfego de veículos 29 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified