2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0021731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “is” and the “ought”: How do perceived social norms influence safety behaviors at work?

Abstract: Despite a widespread view that social norms have an important contextual influence on health attitudes and behaviors, the impact of normative influences on safety behaviors has received very little attention. The current study proposes that supervisors' and coworkers' descriptive and injunctive safety norms influence proactive and compliance safety behaviors. Longitudinal results from 132 workers in a passenger transportation company support the link between coworkers' descriptive safety norms (at Time 1) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is about adhering to safe work practices and, in a broader sense, indicates behaviors directly related to work tasks. Safety compliance has been defined as engaging in activities that are part of the formal work procedures (i.e., correct use of equipment) and “applying appropriate work practices to reduce exposure to potential hazards and injury” (Fugas et al, 2011, p. 68). When safety participation was spotlighted, it has become evident that these kind of behaviors can enhance safety within the work environment and, generally toward “the maintenance of overall safety system” (Griffin and Neal, 2000, p. 356); this class of behavior can predicted micro-accidents, property damage, near-miss events and lost-time injuries (Curcuruto et al, 2015; Saracino et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is about adhering to safe work practices and, in a broader sense, indicates behaviors directly related to work tasks. Safety compliance has been defined as engaging in activities that are part of the formal work procedures (i.e., correct use of equipment) and “applying appropriate work practices to reduce exposure to potential hazards and injury” (Fugas et al, 2011, p. 68). When safety participation was spotlighted, it has become evident that these kind of behaviors can enhance safety within the work environment and, generally toward “the maintenance of overall safety system” (Griffin and Neal, 2000, p. 356); this class of behavior can predicted micro-accidents, property damage, near-miss events and lost-time injuries (Curcuruto et al, 2015; Saracino et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, staff's positive attitudes towards safety in their unit in general (Fugas et al . , Schwappach et al . ) and towards patients’ involvement in ensuring their safety (Schwappach et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups and teams, rather than individuals, have become the foundation of contemporary organizations. At the same time, the literature, which initially focused on individual‐level variables (e.g., workers’ attitudes and the role of leadership), has evolved to consider group‐level constructs such as the influence of social norms in the context of the social ecology where safety behaviors are learned and reinforced …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the predictors of safety behaviors, their mediators, and their moderators tended to use multiple linear regression analysis and focus on either safety compliance behaviors or proactive safety behaviors, but rarely on different combinations of the two. So far, to our knowledge, the study of safety behavioral patterns using multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) has not received much attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation