2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41055-020-00081-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ism in Veganism: The Case for a Minimal Practice-based Definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enthusiasts suggest that this mainstreaming of veganism has the potential to enact significant ethical, ecological and health changes to an agri-food system increasingly understood as broken ( Friedrich, 2020 ; Dutkiewicz and Dickstein, 2021 ). Meanwhile critics caution that this mainstreaming risks diluting the radical ethics of veganism, and argue that it is characterised by notable continuities and consolidations of who is developing, producing and profiting from new vegan products ( White, 2018 ; Clay et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: The Rise Of Big Veganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enthusiasts suggest that this mainstreaming of veganism has the potential to enact significant ethical, ecological and health changes to an agri-food system increasingly understood as broken ( Friedrich, 2020 ; Dutkiewicz and Dickstein, 2021 ). Meanwhile critics caution that this mainstreaming risks diluting the radical ethics of veganism, and argue that it is characterised by notable continuities and consolidations of who is developing, producing and profiting from new vegan products ( White, 2018 ; Clay et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: The Rise Of Big Veganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veganism's ethical and practical transformations of the self and society deal 'directly with practices rather than with principles -veganism is itself a principle, from which certain practices logically flow' (Cross, 1949, p. 15). Recently, Dutkiewicz and Dickstein (2021) sought to simplify definitions of veganism by moving away from beliefs and towards the material practices of abstaining from eating animals. Here, veganism is understood as a practice that does not necessarily follow a moral principle; a vegan could be someone under this definition who refuses animal products for any reason and not for emancipatory principles.…”
Section: Embodied Vegan Geographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Motivations for adopting and promoting veganism may differ from place to place and person to person, but ultimately the effect is the same-namely, boycotts of the meat, dairy, egg, wool, and other animal-exploiting industries (Hahn 2014). In short, no matter how else it is described, veganism is fundamentally a practice, something one does rather than something one believes (Dickstein et al 2020;Dutkiewicz and Dickstein 2021). This fact permits us to label the phenomenon of "transnational veganism" even in the absence of a standardized or universal ideology.…”
Section: Jain Veganism In Transnational Veganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly thereafter, Watson's definition was critiqued by colleagues who insisted that the -ism of veganism should signify an ethos or ideology and not merely a pattern of behavior (Cross 1949). Yet regardless of the details and outcomes of this early debate over the definition of the term, in addition to the logical plausibility of "veganism" signifying anything but a practice (Dutkiewicz and Dickstein 2021), fast-forward seventy years and the original practice-centric definition still remains the most common understanding (now with "diet" extending to medicines, clothing, and other consumables).…”
Section: Jain Veganism In Transnational Veganismmentioning
confidence: 99%