2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The isobaric multiplet mass equation for revisited

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of neutron-deficient 58 Ni projectile fragments yielded new masses for 41 Ti, 43 V, 45 Cr, 47 Mn, 49 Fe, 51 Co, 53 Ni, and 55 Cu T z = −3/2 nuclei [30,35,36]. These new masses enabled us 5 ■■■ 010019-5 JPS Conf.…”
Section: The Mass Of 53 Ni and The Test Of The Isobaric Multiplet Masmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements of neutron-deficient 58 Ni projectile fragments yielded new masses for 41 Ti, 43 V, 45 Cr, 47 Mn, 49 Fe, 51 Co, 53 Ni, and 55 Cu T z = −3/2 nuclei [30,35,36]. These new masses enabled us 5 ■■■ 010019-5 JPS Conf.…”
Section: The Mass Of 53 Ni and The Test Of The Isobaric Multiplet Masmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to our measurements, there have been extensive tests in the sd-shell nuclei (see Ref. [51] and references therein). However, no significant deviations were found except for slight disagreements at A =8, 9, 32, and 33.…”
Section: The Mass Of 53 Ni and The Test Of The Isobaric Multiplet Masmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1977 experimental measurement of the 36 Ar( 3 He, 8 Li) 31 Cl Q-value resulted in a mass excess value of ∆ = −7070 ± 50 keV [20]. Subsequent evalutions of the IMME [6][7][8]21] 31 Si [27][28][29]), the 50-keV uncertainty in the 31 Cl mass excess has hindered attempts to test the IMME stringently in the lowest quartet. A recent Penning trap mass measurement of 31 Cl finally obtained a value for the ground state mass excess 15 times more precise than previous estimates [30], leading to an IMME breakdown in the lowest quartet; the IMME fit required an unusually large cubic term, with d = −3.5(11) keV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Refs. [6] and [7], in situations where the fit of the quadratic form is very poor, a cubic or quartic form with extra terms dT 3 z or eT 4 z may be required. Typically, these terms have been determined empirically to be either very small, 1 keV, or consistent with zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quadratic form of IMME turns out to work remarkably well for almost all isobaric multiplets where data exist [15][16][17]. Hence it becomes a powerful tool to predict unknown masses, particularly those of very neutron-deficient nuclei important for the astrophysical rp-process [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%