A new interpretation of the mechanism used by Endrenyi and LeRoy for the calculation of the rate constant for 11-pcntyl isomeriza~ion is proposed. The addition of onc step to thc scheme makes possible a recalculation of the Arrhenius parameters. Significantly different values are found which eliminate the previously reported low A-factor. Canod~an Joulxal of Chcrnis[l.), SO, 3738 (1972) A discrepancy has long been recognized (1) pose into ethylene and ethyl radicals at about between the r e~o r t e d A-factors and those esti-157". mated from reasonable entropies of activation for the thermal isomerization of/?-pentyl(2) and 17-hexyl (3) radicals.The reported A-factors were about 10' s-', whereas the theoretical A-factors for 17-pentyl and 17-hexyl isomerization were estimated to be 1010.5-11 o s -l (lb, lc) and 101Os-l (4) respectively. The purpose of this communication is to suggest a resolution of this dilemma for 17-pentyl radical isomerization.In the case of isomerization of 17-pentyl radicals by 1,4-hydrogen atom migration. a reinterpretation of the original data of Endrznyi and LeRoy (2) suggests a suitable solution. These workers carried out their kinetic runs at temperatures between 165 and 230'. They assumed that the only reactions of .set-pentyl were isomerization back to n-pentyl, and combination with methyl. In other reports of 17-pentyl radical isomerization, both Gordon and McNesby (5) and Wijnen (6) observed that ,rec-pentyl radicals formed from 17-pentyl isomerization at 300' decomposed. Also, Morganroth and Calvert (7) in a study of the photolysis of 17-azobutane observed that il-butyl radicals began to decoinThis work proposes that in the calculations of Endrenyi and LeRoy a significant fraction of .set-pentyl radicals was not accounted for because they decomposed by reaction 3. A propene balance on their data (8) shows this suggestion to be a reasonable one. The three most important propene forming reactions (excluding 3) are Other reactions yielding C,H, can be imagined but their contribution is relatively unimportant. The rate of formation of propene fi-om these reactions can be estimated by the following expression where known o r estimated disproportionation to combination ratios can be used.R,(C,Hl,) is the rate of formation of 17-C,H14 from propyl radical combination. It is estimated from expression (iv) (8), kdj = A(n-Pr, n-Pr) = 0.15 (9); ki was estimated to be 0.04, from Can. J. Chem. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 54.245.13.81 on 05/11/18For personal use only.