2022
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271822500833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The issue of branched Hamiltonian in F(T) teleparallel gravity

Abstract: As in the case of Lanczos–Lovelock gravity, the main advantage of [Formula: see text] gravity is said to be that it leads to second-order field equations, while [Formula: see text] gravity theory leads to fourth-order equations. We show that it is rather a disadvantage, since it leads to the unresolved issue of ‘Branched Hamiltonian’. The problem is bypassed in [Formula: see text] gravity theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We quote from [22] the general argument in connection with the total derivative terms: "it is just the change of the variables in the wave function and the phase transformation, plus the change of the integration measure, and the transformation of the momenta respecting the change of the measure, and so a unitary transformation relates the two". It is possible (although we have not found this) that each pair of quantum equations cast from ( 27) and ( 28), ( 31) and (32), and ( 45) and ( 47) are related by unitary transformation. However, it was also mentioned [22] that different forms of coupling parameter yield different quantum dynamics in the case of MHF, due to the presence of a coupling term ( f (φ)p φ ) for the non-minimally coupled case, and (γ (φ)p φ ) for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton coupled case, in the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: The Role Of Divergent Termsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We quote from [22] the general argument in connection with the total derivative terms: "it is just the change of the variables in the wave function and the phase transformation, plus the change of the integration measure, and the transformation of the momenta respecting the change of the measure, and so a unitary transformation relates the two". It is possible (although we have not found this) that each pair of quantum equations cast from ( 27) and ( 28), ( 31) and (32), and ( 45) and ( 47) are related by unitary transformation. However, it was also mentioned [22] that different forms of coupling parameter yield different quantum dynamics in the case of MHF, due to the presence of a coupling term ( f (φ)p φ ) for the non-minimally coupled case, and (γ (φ)p φ ) for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton coupled case, in the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: The Role Of Divergent Termsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, here the difference is predominant and explicit. Note that the f (φ) term does not appear in (31), while it is coupled with p φ in (32). This coupled ( f (φ)p φ ) term requires operator ordering in the quantum domain, which is different for different forms of f (φ).…”
Section: Non-minimally Coupled Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation