2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The issue of stress state during mechanical tests to assess cladding performance during a reactivity-initiated accident (RIA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress biaxiality is between 0.6 and 0.95. Efforts are currently underway to develop easy-to-use testing techniques on cladding tubes that cover such loading biaxiality levels [22,12,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress biaxiality is between 0.6 and 0.95. Efforts are currently underway to develop easy-to-use testing techniques on cladding tubes that cover such loading biaxiality levels [22,12,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROMETRA database includes tests at different biaxiality levels from uniaxial to plane-strain, with uniaxial tests in cladding axial direction, uniaxial ring tests, plane strain tensile tests and burst tests. Nevertheless, and as recently stated by Desquines et al [9], additional work is required to predict the cladding tube fracture at RIA representative stress state. In addition, it is important to improve the understanding of the effect of the hydride microstructure on the cladding fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…4(b) and (c), if the pellet-cladding friction coef cient is assumed to be 0.05, the nite element method (FEM) analysis of the A-EDC test has revealed that the strain ratio of ε z / ε θ uctuates slightly around −0.5, and the stress ratio of σ z / σ θ remains nearly zero, which is close to the uniaxial tension requirments. 9,10) In the comparison, the FEM of conventional EDC test shows that its strain ratio is around −0.5, but the stress ratio ranges from −0.25 to 0.2 9,19) , which is probably ascribed to the variable friction on the pellet-cladding contact surface. Figure 5 shows load-hoop strain and load-height displacement curves, where the hoop strain and height displacement belong to the cladding specimen and Cu inner pellet, respectively.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Zircaloy-4mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fig. 4 (a) system of A-EDC simulation; Comparison of (b) ε z /ε θ ratio and (c) σ z /σ θ ratio in A-EDC and EDC 9,19) tests derived from FEM analysis; ID-Inner diameter; MD-Middle diameter; OD-Outer diameter. the inner pellet fairly xed the position of the ring-shaped specimen.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Zircaloy-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation