2019
DOI: 10.9770/ird.2019.1.3(1)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The issues of increasing the effectiveness of teaching comparative economics

Abstract: In the conditions of intensive globalization processes, the problem of international comparisons of countries ' development increases. The usual methods of comparisons based on macroeconomic indicators today do not reflect the real reality, so it becomes important in the teaching of economic Sciences to give students a methodology for comparing the economic development of countries on the basis of numerous rating studies. In recent years, the development of rating comparisons has become one of the priorities o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, these ideas for analysing and regulating income distribution are fundamental for the studies of living standards and economic processes caused by their changes. In particular, the noted studies analyse the links between income distribution and economic growth [20], including investment flows [21][22][23], income inequality, and current account imbalances [24,25]; indirect impact of some specific factors on income inequality [26][27][28], particularly tolerance for corruption [29]. Baradas and Lagoa [30] also investigate new trends in globalisation, including changes in education and business cycles, within the framework of the analysis of the impact of the financialization process on the labour force share in Gross domestic product (GDP) due to its impact on government activity and trade union density.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, these ideas for analysing and regulating income distribution are fundamental for the studies of living standards and economic processes caused by their changes. In particular, the noted studies analyse the links between income distribution and economic growth [20], including investment flows [21][22][23], income inequality, and current account imbalances [24,25]; indirect impact of some specific factors on income inequality [26][27][28], particularly tolerance for corruption [29]. Baradas and Lagoa [30] also investigate new trends in globalisation, including changes in education and business cycles, within the framework of the analysis of the impact of the financialization process on the labour force share in Gross domestic product (GDP) due to its impact on government activity and trade union density.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic inequalities are the most obvious, as they show different positions of people in the distribution of income, wealth, goods, including wages [10]. Although the basis of the distribution of income is based on the principles of global economic distribution, the issue of economy, welfare at country and individual level is imperative and can be centered on the policy of equal opportunities for all members of a society [11], [12], [13] If a state government decides to reduce the level of economic inequality [14], [15], it may apply a few sets of tools: (1) redistribution -from those with high incomes to those with low incomes; (2) the grid of opportunities widely available and (3) social responsibility. Redistribution involves taking from the income of those with higher incomes and supplementing the incomes of those with lower incomes [16].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there can be considerable consequences. In order to capture the contextual factors and business dynamics including the dynamism of market, a significant role is played in the performance of firm and management of environment (Baltgailis, 2019). The failure of the environmental policies to achieve the objectives is because of the lack of such factors (Luthra, Garg, & Haleem, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%