2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Italian USL Toscana Centro model of a vascular hub responding to the COVID-19 emergency

Abstract: Background: Spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy forced health facilities to drastically change their organization to face the overwhelming number of infected patients needing hospitalization. The aim of this paper is to share with all the vascular community the protocol developed by the USL (Unità Sanitaria Locale) Toscana Centro for the reorganization of the Vascular Surgery Unit during the COVID-19 emergency, hoping to help other institutions to face the emergency during the hard weeks coming. Method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50,51,55,56 For other medical conditions requiring surgery under particular circumstances, such as relapse of inflammatory bowel disease, dedicated hubs were identified. 9457…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51,55,56 For other medical conditions requiring surgery under particular circumstances, such as relapse of inflammatory bowel disease, dedicated hubs were identified. 9457…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Northern Italy, the overwhelming number of COVID-19 patients required a complete reorganization of the healthcare system [3,4]: wards were converted into COVID-19 care units, and deferrable surgeries and outpatient consultations were suspended. Some hospitals were designated hubs for specific urgent conditions [5], with the need to maximize resources and reduce patient crowding, reducing potential nosocomial COVID-19 spread.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 19 articles had reported changes in the conduct of emergency and elective VS cases in respective institutions. 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 In summary, all articles reported continuation of emergency VS cases such as ruptured AAAs, and deferment of non-urgent elective VS cases such as revascularization for claudicants and varicose veins. There was some inter-institutional variation between the type of VS cases that proceeded or were deferred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%