2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0621-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity

Abstract: The PBAPI-I has good psychometric properties that replicate those of other versions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBPI) was used to assess the unhelpful beliefs concerning chronic pain, which often lead to increased pain perception and maladaptive behaviors (Monticone, Baiardi, Ferrari e t al ., ). This is a 16‐item questionnaire with a four‐point Likert scale ranging from −2 (total disagreement) to 2 (total agreement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBPI) was used to assess the unhelpful beliefs concerning chronic pain, which often lead to increased pain perception and maladaptive behaviors (Monticone, Baiardi, Ferrari e t al ., ). This is a 16‐item questionnaire with a four‐point Likert scale ranging from −2 (total disagreement) to 2 (total agreement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It includes three subscales, stability of pain, pain as a mystery, and self‐blame. A mean score is computed for each scale, with higher scores indicating greater agreement with the belief (Monticone et al ., ; Williams & Thorn, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change provided a further tool to explore disorders not associates with intermittent pain, like headache, in which is likely that Constancy and Permanence are regarded differently by patients . In this new version, PBPI was validated in the United States by its developers, in England, in Norway, in France, in China, and in Italy . It is worth noting that it is not possible to define a score of normality for PBPI subscales, because mental representations can never be regarded as pathological in themselves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory, with estimates perfectly in line with the original (0.65 to 0.80), U.K. English replication (0.80 to 0.89), Chinese (0.60 to 0.76), Australian (0.67 to 0.80), Italian (0.91 to 0.96), and German (0.64 to 0.83) versions of the PBPI . Test–retest stability was excellent, with higher estimates than the Italian version (0.73 to 0.81), although no other comparisons could be made, as this was not investigated in other samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The PBPI is a self‐administered questionnaire composed of 16 items with different statements about common pain‐related beliefs and perceptions. The PBPI has been translated and validated into several languages and has been used in several different contexts . However, a European Portuguese version of this instrument was not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%