How Do Brains Work? 1972
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9427-3_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Jamming Avoidance Response of High Frequency Electric Fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational features include detection of amplitude modulations, detection of phase modulations by differential phase comparison, evaluation of the temporal pattern of the amplitude and phase modulation and a removal of orientation ambiguity by spatial integration of sensory information. These features are identical to those employed by the only very remotely related gymnotiform electric fish Eigenmannia which performs almost identical JARs (Watanabe and Takeda 1963;Bullock et al 1972aBullock et al ,b, 1975Heiligenberg 1991;Heiligenberg et al 1978a,b;Heiligenberg and Bastian 1980;Bastian and Heiligenberg 1980;Carr et al 1986a, b;Heiligenberg 1985b, 1986a,b;Rose 1985, 1986;Keller 1988;Rose et al 1988). The great similarity of the rather complex computational algorithm for the JAR is remarkable since Gymnarchus and Eigenmannia lack common electroreceptive/electrogenic ancestors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The computational features include detection of amplitude modulations, detection of phase modulations by differential phase comparison, evaluation of the temporal pattern of the amplitude and phase modulation and a removal of orientation ambiguity by spatial integration of sensory information. These features are identical to those employed by the only very remotely related gymnotiform electric fish Eigenmannia which performs almost identical JARs (Watanabe and Takeda 1963;Bullock et al 1972aBullock et al ,b, 1975Heiligenberg 1991;Heiligenberg et al 1978a,b;Heiligenberg and Bastian 1980;Bastian and Heiligenberg 1980;Carr et al 1986a, b;Heiligenberg 1985b, 1986a,b;Rose 1985, 1986;Keller 1988;Rose et al 1988). The great similarity of the rather complex computational algorithm for the JAR is remarkable since Gymnarchus and Eigenmannia lack common electroreceptive/electrogenic ancestors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Animals were stimulated with sinusoidal electrical signals mimicking conspecifics with a range of EOD frequencies. All animals performed a two-sided JAR in which they increased their EOD frequency upon negative difference frequencies and vice versa as described in the literature (Watanabe and Takeda 1963;Bullock et al 1972;Heiligenberg 1980Heiligenberg , 1991, indicating that they responded to stimulation as they would do to conspecifics. All tested animals showed a JAR, but individual differences in the response strength could be observed.…”
Section: Frequency Modulations In Response To Mimicks Of Conspecificsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The changes observed can therefore be distinguished from a pure adjustment to clutter and interpreted as a jamming avoidance response (JAR). The bats do not use exclusive frequency bands as seen in the JAR of electric fish (Bullock et al 1972;McGregor and Westby 1992) or assumed in Rhinopoma hardwickei (Habersetzter 1981). They rather appear to use distinct sonagram shapes and/or separate calls temporally by vocalizing asynchronously with conspecifics, thereby also addressing the problem of masking (Kalko and Schnitzler 1993).…”
Section: Effects Of Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%