2002
DOI: 10.3905/joi.2002.319520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The January Effect and the Global Value-Growth Premium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These markets did not, however, display a relationship between the seasonality of returns and company size that would be as strong as the one observed in the United States. This was also confirmed by more recent studies by Arshanapalli, Coggin, and Nelson (2002). It is worth mentioning that the January effect was also present in countries where there capital profits are not taxed (e.g., Japan- Kiyoshi, 1985) as well as those where the end of the tax year does not correspond to the end of the calendar year (e.g., the United Kingdom- Reinganum and Shapiro, 1987;Hillier and Marshall, 2002;Zhang and Jacobsen, 2013;Australia-Brown et al, 1983).…”
Section: Month-of-the-year Effectsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These markets did not, however, display a relationship between the seasonality of returns and company size that would be as strong as the one observed in the United States. This was also confirmed by more recent studies by Arshanapalli, Coggin, and Nelson (2002). It is worth mentioning that the January effect was also present in countries where there capital profits are not taxed (e.g., Japan- Kiyoshi, 1985) as well as those where the end of the tax year does not correspond to the end of the calendar year (e.g., the United Kingdom- Reinganum and Shapiro, 1987;Hillier and Marshall, 2002;Zhang and Jacobsen, 2013;Australia-Brown et al, 1983).…”
Section: Month-of-the-year Effectsupporting
confidence: 62%