2021
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry (J‐AB): Annual report in 2019

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We think this because vascular complications are infrequent in a nationwide registry of non-ESKD patients, where BARC ≥2 bleeding complications occurred in 1.12%. 25 This figure is substantially smaller than that of the present cohort, where we observed BARC ≥2 bleeding in 12%. The order of magnitude greater rate of puncture site bleeding in our cohort compared to non-ESKD counterparts cannot be due to differences in the use of ultrasound-guided puncture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…We think this because vascular complications are infrequent in a nationwide registry of non-ESKD patients, where BARC ≥2 bleeding complications occurred in 1.12%. 25 This figure is substantially smaller than that of the present cohort, where we observed BARC ≥2 bleeding in 12%. The order of magnitude greater rate of puncture site bleeding in our cohort compared to non-ESKD counterparts cannot be due to differences in the use of ultrasound-guided puncture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The incidence in our study was on the low end of that range (0.3% and 0.2%, respectively) and was similar to that reported in the Japanese Catheter Ablation registry (0.64% and 0.14%, respectively). 10 Given that there was no oral anticoagulant-related bleeding in the present study, anticoagulants appeared to be well controlled. Taken together, our findings demonstrate a favourable safety profile for VS-guided AF ablation in Japanese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…11 The PVS patients in our cohort were 10 years younger than Japanese AF ablation patients reported in The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry (mean [±SD] age 67±11 years). 2 In addition, based on the left atrial diameter evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography, the left atrial remodeling in our cohort was less advanced than that in general AF ablation cases. 13-15 PVS after AF ablation has been reported, even in pediatric cases.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pvs After Af Ablationmentioning
confidence: 58%