2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2022.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Japanese version of the children’s sleep habits questionnaire (CSHQ-J): A validation study and influencing factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for using a cut-off of 48 was first of all to avoid an overestimation of sleep disturbances in children of such a young age as in our sample, who are very often subject to sleep disturbances that are not necessarily pathological and because the CSQH is calibrated on a larger reference population in terms of age ( 12 ). This methodological choice is also supported by literature: indeed, there are several different works that have highlighted how the cut-off of 48 had a higher sensitivity in different populations both with TD ( 31 , 32 ), and with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as DD and young children with ASD in very large samples ( 11 , 23 ).…”
Section: Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnairementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The reason for using a cut-off of 48 was first of all to avoid an overestimation of sleep disturbances in children of such a young age as in our sample, who are very often subject to sleep disturbances that are not necessarily pathological and because the CSQH is calibrated on a larger reference population in terms of age ( 12 ). This methodological choice is also supported by literature: indeed, there are several different works that have highlighted how the cut-off of 48 had a higher sensitivity in different populations both with TD ( 31 , 32 ), and with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as DD and young children with ASD in very large samples ( 11 , 23 ).…”
Section: Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnairementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) is a parent-report screening survey published by Owens et al in 2000, which has been validated for school-aged children [ 28 ]. It has been translated into many languages [ 29 , 30 , 31 ] and used in multiple studies on children of different ages and neuro-developmental conditions [ 10 , 32 , 33 ]. In our study, we used the German version translated and validated by Schlarb et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the seven subscales in the present study attained an acceptable level for internal consistency as measured by McDonald's Omega H. The internal consistency in the present study (Omega H = 0.573-0.827) was in concordance with Cronbach's α (0.55-0.85) presented by Parreira et al [19] for a clinical group (ADHD group and sleep problem group). Internal consistency was also in concordance with, or slightly higher than, previous findings from the US (Cronbach's α = 0.36-0.70) [3], Norway (Cronbach's α = 0.26-0.79) [16], Portugal (Cronbach's α = 0.44-0.74) [11], Germany (Cronbach's α = 0.23-0.70) [37], Italy (Cronbach's α = 0.550-0.712) [12], and Japan (Cronbach's α = 0.42-0.68) [10]. McDonald's Omega H was 0.573 and considered to be below the acceptable level for the subscale "Parasomnias", which is a finding in line with the study by Hanset et al [16] where Cronbach's α was reported to be 0.58.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) is a widely used sleep assessment instrument capturing various dimensions of sleep problems. It was originally published in English [3], and translations and validations have been made in several languages with satisfactory psychometric properties [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Several CSHQ validation studies have focused on the general population and excluded children with neurodevelopmental disorders [3,7,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%