2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The JKR-type adhesive contact problems for power-law shaped axisymmetric punches

Abstract: The JKR (Johnson, Kendall, and Roberts) and Boussinesq-Kendall models describe adhesive frictionless contact between two isotropic elastic spheres, and between a flat-ended axisymmetric punch and an elastic half-space respectively. However, the shapes of contacting solids may be more general than spherical or flat ones. In addition, the derivation of the main formulae of these models is based on the assumption that the material points within the contact region can move along the punch surface without any frict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the approach was applied to a sphere described as a paraboloid of revolution z = r 2 /(2 R ), very far generalizations of the approach are possible. Recently, the approach has been extended to non-slipping boundary conditions [47], transversely isotropic solids [48] and the punches of arbitrary axisymmetric blunt shapes contacting elastic materials with rotational symmetry of their elastic properties [44]. It is attempted here to follow the original JKR approach as closely as possible, hence we denote as a 1 , P 0 and δ 2 the true values of the radius of adhesive contact, the external load and the displacement, respectively.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the approach was applied to a sphere described as a paraboloid of revolution z = r 2 /(2 R ), very far generalizations of the approach are possible. Recently, the approach has been extended to non-slipping boundary conditions [47], transversely isotropic solids [48] and the punches of arbitrary axisymmetric blunt shapes contacting elastic materials with rotational symmetry of their elastic properties [44]. It is attempted here to follow the original JKR approach as closely as possible, hence we denote as a 1 , P 0 and δ 2 the true values of the radius of adhesive contact, the external load and the displacement, respectively.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as the characteristic scale for a 3D adhesive contact problem, Borodich et al [47] took the radius a 1 of the contact region at P 0 =0. For 2D membranes, the dimensionless variables could be also specified using various characteristic scales, in particular, via the radius of the membrane.…”
Section: Adhesion To a Circular Graphene Monolayer Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 In the same year, Borodich provided another derivation of Galanov's solution; however, it was published much later. 36 Some recent results related to the generalization of JKR theory for axisymmetric adhesive contact problems have been reviewed by Borodich. 37 For the contact problems involving non-axisymmetric shapes, the absence of radial symmetry presents significant difficulty in the numerical simulation, because the number of nonlinear equations increases from N to N 2 , as discussed Sec.…”
Section: Models In Contact Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models include the JKR (JohnsonKendall-Roberts), DMT (Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov), and Maugis models [1,16]. The extension of the JKR approach to axisymmetric solids of arbitrary monomial shape f (r) = B d r d [17][18][19] shows that the shape of the probe can considerably affect the value of the force of adhesion. Here f is the shape of the probe, r the radial coordinate, d is the degree of the monom (parabola) and B d is a constant.…”
Section: Depth-sensing Indentation and Adhesive Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%