2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The joint effects of materiality thresholds and voluntary disclosure incentives on firms’ disclosure decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Although earnings press releases are subject to the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and may not mislead or omit material information, there are no requirements for mandatory disclosure of all material line items in an earnings press release. Consequently, our predictions regarding disclosure of specific line items are not merely due to any mandatory disclosure requirements (see Heitzman et al 2008). 6 Except for the balance sheet claims factor, the rest of the factors are consistent with natural aggregation suggested by financial statement analysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…5 Although earnings press releases are subject to the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and may not mislead or omit material information, there are no requirements for mandatory disclosure of all material line items in an earnings press release. Consequently, our predictions regarding disclosure of specific line items are not merely due to any mandatory disclosure requirements (see Heitzman et al 2008). 6 Except for the balance sheet claims factor, the rest of the factors are consistent with natural aggregation suggested by financial statement analysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some authors find that managers are more likely to provide forecasts when their firms' underlying earnings performance is strong (e.g., Patell, 1976;Penman, 1980;Lev and Penman, 1990;Miller, 2002) while other authors find that there is also a ARTICLE IN PRESS 4 We acknowledge that most disclosures are not literally voluntary, in the sense that economic forces are likely to compel managers' disclosures (Heitzman et al, 2008) but use the term to refer to non-mandated disclosures (i.e., disclosures other than those required on a regular basis by the securities laws). For example, the evidence in Noe (1999), Cheng andLo (2006), Billings (2008), and Rogers (2008) shows that managers' disclosure decisions are sometimes made in conjunction with their own trading decisions to enhance the profitability of those trades, subject to constraints imposed by the securities laws.…”
Section: Regular Versus Sporadic Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, as Heitzman et al (2010) discuss, an observed negative association between disclosure and the cost of capital could be mechanical. In particular, firms with high costs of capital have lower earnings response coefficients.…”
Section: Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the literature has interpreted the AIMR rankings and other self-constructed indices of disclosure as representing voluntary disclosures, these measures capture both voluntary and mandatory material disclosures (see Heitzman et al (2010) for a detailed discussion). Thus, it is unclear whether the association between disclosures and liquidity is attributable to voluntary or mandatory disclosures, or some interaction of the two.…”
Section: Motives For Voluntarily Disclosures and Financial Reporting mentioning
confidence: 99%