2023
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acca98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The joint impact of the carbon market on carbon emissions, energy mix, and copollutants

Abstract: From a comprehensive standpoint, this paper investigates whether and to what extent the carbon market functions in the context of the developing world. Taking advantage of a unique seven-year-plant-level panel dataset (2010-2016) on Chinese power plants, we use a matched difference-in-differences strategy to identify the joint impact of China's carbon emissions trading (CET) pilot policy on carbon emissions reduction (objective), energy mix improvement (mechanism), and air copollutant reduction (cobenefits). W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emission trading system (ETS), a marketbased emission reduction measure, has been explored in terms of its effectiveness in economic development and emission abatement. Based on plant-level panel data over 2010-2016, the current emission trading pilot policy for power plants might have lowered carbon emissions by 39% with substantial co-benefits in air pollutant emission reductions, primarily by cutting coal consumption [23]. In addition, extending the ETS from electricity production to five other highemission sectors (metallurgy, transport and storage, petroleum and gas, nonmetal mining, and 'other service') could reduce the marginal abatement cost by more than 80% and reach a balance between market activation and market manipulation risk [24].…”
Section: Anthropogenic Emission Mitigation Faced With Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission trading system (ETS), a marketbased emission reduction measure, has been explored in terms of its effectiveness in economic development and emission abatement. Based on plant-level panel data over 2010-2016, the current emission trading pilot policy for power plants might have lowered carbon emissions by 39% with substantial co-benefits in air pollutant emission reductions, primarily by cutting coal consumption [23]. In addition, extending the ETS from electricity production to five other highemission sectors (metallurgy, transport and storage, petroleum and gas, nonmetal mining, and 'other service') could reduce the marginal abatement cost by more than 80% and reach a balance between market activation and market manipulation risk [24].…”
Section: Anthropogenic Emission Mitigation Faced With Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon trading serves as a climate change mitigation strategy by creating economic incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions [1]. The approach enables industries and countries to trade carbon credits, allowing those exceeding emission reduction targets to sell surplus credits to entities struggling to meet their targets [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%