The journey to UHC: how well are vertical programmes integrated in the health benefits package? A scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundCountries are recommended to progressively work towards universal health coverage (UHC), and to make explicit choices regarding the expansion of priority services. However, there is little guidance on how to manage the inclusion of vertical programmes, funded by external partners, in health benefits packages (HBP) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveWe conducted a scoping review to map the inclusion of six vertical programmes (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, contraceptives, immunisation) in 26 LMICs.MethodsWe identified 26 LMICs with an HBP that was not aspirational (eg, with evidence of implementation or funding). For each HBP, we collected information on the corresponding UHC scheme, health financing at the time of establishment, revisions since inception and entitlements. For each vertical programme, we developed a list of tracer interventions based on the Disease Control Priorities 3 and the 100 Core Health Indicators List. We then used this list of tracer interventions to map the coverage of the six vertical programmes.ResultsThe review shows that there is no common starting point for countries embarking into UHC. Some HBPs were almost three decades old. Whole package revisions are rare. The inclusion of vertical programme does not follow a given pattern based on health financing indicators or country’s income group. Maternal child health services are the most often included and family planning the least. Six countries in our sample covered all vertical programmes, while one covered only one of six.ConclusionsThis review has shown that there has been a long history of countries facing this question and we have provided the first mapping of inclusion of vertical programmes in UHC. The results of the mapping can inform decisions in countries embarking in UHC.

Rethinking the donor's role in strengthening health systems through sexual and reproductive health and rights partnerships: A qualitative analysis of Ugandan case studies

“…There are major challenges in the provision of SRH services in the country, and emerging studies suggest that indirect effects of the national COVID‐19 response deteriorated the situation (Burt et al, 2021). With regard to SRHR, one of the main components, contraception, is not included in Uganda's national minimum healthcare package (Regan et al, 2021), resulting in an unmet need for family planning among approximately 30% of women (Uganda Bureau of Statistics ICF, 2017). Moreover, sexual rights for adolescents and sexual minority groups are highly contentious (McKay & Angotti, 2016), and this is seen to curtail the universality in access to healthcare and fulfilment of the SRHR for these groups (Müller et al, 2018).…”

Sustainable financing for vaccination towards advancing universal health coverage in the WHO African region: The strategic role of national health insurance

“…9 , 11–13 However, there has been poor progress toward specification of services that are covered by vertical health programs in benefit packages. 61 Considering the public health value of immunization, 24 it is recommended that it should be prioritized in all the benefit packages of national health insurance schemes in the African region. Critical decisions on which vaccines to deliver should be made jointly with the national immunization program and guided by the national immunization strategy of the country and WHO recommendations.…”

From Universal Health Coverage services packages to budget appropriation: the long journey to implementation

“…For example, Nigeria, Kenya, Vietnam and Tanzania successfully integrated their family planning and HIV/AIDS treatment programmes into UHC schemes while transitioning away from external funding. 31 32 …”